Cross-Framework Mapping

Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk ManagementvsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements

See exactly how Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management controls map to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
46%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management maps to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements with 46% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Risk Management Lifecycle(3 mappings)

CA-ITSG33-RM-02Authorisation to Operate
IR-4Continuous Monitoring
CA-ITSG33-RM-03Continuous Monitoring2 targets
IR-4Continuous Monitoring
VES-3Penetration Testing

Security Controls(17 mappings)

CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue2 targets
CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management3 targets
CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan
IR-2Incident Documentation
KR-CSAP-SC-02Infrastructure and Network Security3 targets
33CFR105.305Facility Security Assessment
33CFR105.400Facility Security Plan (FSP)
33CFR105.405Format and Content of FSP
MARSE-SC-03Identity Verification
CYB-2Account Security Measures
NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
IR-2Incident Documentation
NZ-NZISM-SC-02ICT Security Controls2 targets
IR-4Continuous Monitoring
VES-3Penetration Testing
NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
IR-2Incident Documentation
PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls
CYB-2Account Security Measures
PAS1192-5-SC-03Breach Management3 targets
CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan
VES-3Penetration Testing

Related Comparisons

Other Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management comparisons

Other US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management has 24 controls across its framework, while US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (46% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Controls, where 12 Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management controls have no direct US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

Of 24 total Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management controls, 11 map directly to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 46% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

13 Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Controls with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Controls (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.