TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built EnvironmentsvsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements

See exactly how PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls map to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments maps to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements with 38% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls identifies 15 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Security Controls(17 mappings)

CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue2 targets
→CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
→CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management3 targets
→CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
→CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan
→IR-2Incident Documentation
KR-CSAP-SC-02Infrastructure and Network Security3 targets
→33CFR105.305Facility Security Assessment
→33CFR105.400Facility Security Plan (FSP)
→33CFR105.405Format and Content of FSP
MARSE-SC-03Identity Verification
→CYB-2Account Security Measures
NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
→IR-2Incident Documentation
NZ-NZISM-SC-02ICT Security Controls2 targets
→IR-4Continuous Monitoring
→VES-3Penetration Testing
NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
→IR-2Incident Documentation
PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls
→CYB-2Account Security Measures
PAS1192-5-SC-03Breach Management3 targets
→CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
→CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan
→VES-3Penetration Testing

Related Comparisons

Other PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments comparisons

PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation17 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs CSA CCM v417 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange17 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs ISO 27001:202216 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)15 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework15 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity15 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs MTCS (Singapore)15 mappings

Other US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments has 24 controls across its framework, while US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Controls, where 12 PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls have no direct US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

Of 24 total PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls, 9 map directly to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 15 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

15 PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls have no direct equivalent in US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Controls with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Controls (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.