Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)vsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments
See exactly how Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) controls map to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) maps to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments with 38% coverage across 35 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 92 Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) controls identifies 57 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 92 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 76 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Information Security(20 mappings)
+56 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) comparisons
Other PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?
Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) has 92 controls across its framework, while PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 35 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 19 Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) controls have no direct PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments equivalent.
How many controls map between Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?
Of 92 total Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) controls, 35 map directly to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 57 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?
57 Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) controls have no direct equivalent in PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 19 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?
The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (19 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.