COSO ERMvsEASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation
See exactly how COSO ERM controls map to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
COSO ERM maps to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation with 35% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 COSO ERM controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in COSO ERM: Risk Framework & Governance.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
COSO ERM: Risk Assessment(6 mappings)
COSO ERM: Risk Treatment(9 mappings)
COSO ERM: Risk Monitoring & Review(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other COSO ERM comparisons
Other EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between COSO ERM and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?
COSO ERM has 20 controls across its framework, while EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in COSO ERM: Risk Framework & Governance, where 5 COSO ERM controls have no direct EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation equivalent.
How many controls map between COSO ERM and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?
Of 20 total COSO ERM controls, 7 map directly to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation controls — representing 35% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping COSO ERM to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?
13 COSO ERM controls have no direct equivalent in EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in COSO ERM: Risk Framework & Governance with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between COSO ERM and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?
The domain with the highest gap count is COSO ERM: Risk Framework & Governance (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.