Cross-Framework Mapping

COSO ERMvsBS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience

See exactly how COSO ERM controls map to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
8
Gaps Found
35%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

COSO ERM maps to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience with 35% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 COSO ERM controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in COSO ERM: Risk Framework & Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

COSO ERM: Risk Assessment(3 mappings)

COSO-07Risk analysis and evaluation
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology
COSO-08Risk criteria and thresholds
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology
COSO-09Risk scenario development
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology

COSO ERM: Risk Treatment(6 mappings)

COSO-11Risk treatment options and selection2 targets
BS65000-RM-01Resilience Journey
BS65000-RM-02Integrated Approach
COSO-13Residual risk acceptance2 targets
BS65000-RM-01Resilience Journey
BS65000-RM-02Integrated Approach
COSO-15Control implementation and monitoring2 targets
BS65000-RM-01Resilience Journey
BS65000-RM-02Integrated Approach

COSO ERM: Risk Monitoring & Review(3 mappings)

COSO-19Continuous improvement of risk processes3 targets
BS65000-IM-03Continuous Improvement
ISO-8000-IMP-02Quality Improvement
PBD-IMP-03Organisational Integration

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between COSO ERM and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?

COSO ERM has 20 controls across its framework, while BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in COSO ERM: Risk Framework & Governance, where 5 COSO ERM controls have no direct BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience equivalent.

How many controls map between COSO ERM and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?

Of 20 total COSO ERM controls, 7 map directly to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls — representing 35% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping COSO ERM to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?

13 COSO ERM controls have no direct equivalent in BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience. The highest concentration of gaps is in COSO ERM: Risk Framework & Governance with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between COSO ERM and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?

The domain with the highest gap count is COSO ERM: Risk Framework & Governance (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.