Cross-Framework Mapping

CIS Controls v8vsNIST SP 800-171 Rev 3

See exactly how CIS Controls v8 controls map to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

169
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
75%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CIS Controls v8 maps to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 with 75% coverage across 115 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 153 CIS Controls v8 controls identifies 38 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CIS Control 16: Application Software Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 153 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 306K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 169 mapped controls across 18 domains. Sign up to explore all 306K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

CIS Control 1: Inventory and Control of Enterprise Assets(2 mappings)

CIS-1.1Establish and Maintain Detailed Enterprise Asset Inventory
03.04.10System Component Inventory
CIS-1.2Address Unauthorized Assets
03.04.10System Component Inventory

CIS Control 10: Malware Defenses(5 mappings)

CIS-10.1Deploy and Maintain Anti-Malware Software
03.14.02Malicious Code Protection
CIS-10.2Configure Automatic Anti-Malware Signature Updates
03.14.02Malicious Code Protection
CIS-10.4Configure Automatic Anti-Malware Scanning of Removable Media
03.14.02Malicious Code Protection
CIS-10.6Centrally Manage Anti-Malware Software
03.14.02Malicious Code Protection
CIS-10.7Use Behavior-Based Anti-Malware Software
03.14.02Malicious Code Protection

CIS Control 11: Data Recovery(1 mappings)

CIS-11.3Protect Recovery Data
03.08.09System Backup - Cryptographic Protection

CIS Control 12: Network Infrastructure Management(9 mappings)

CIS-12.1Ensure Network Infrastructure is Up-to-Date2 targets
03.14.01Flaw Remediation
03.16.02Unsupported System Components
CIS-12.2Establish and Maintain a Secure Network Architecture
03.13.01Boundary Protection
CIS-12.4Establish and Maintain Architecture Diagram(s)
03.15.02System Security Plan
CIS-12.6Use of Secure Network Management and Communication Protocols2 targets
03.01.16Wireless Access
03.13.08Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
CIS-12.7Ensure Remote Devices Utilize a VPN and are Connecting to an Enterprise’s AAA Infrastructure2 targets
03.01.12Remote Access
03.07.05Nonlocal Maintenance
CIS-12.8Establish and Maintain Dedicated Computing Resources for All Administrative Work
03.01.06Least Privilege - Privileged Accounts

CIS Control 13: Network Monitoring and Defense(3 mappings)

CIS-13.1Centralize Security Event Alerting3 targets
03.03.05Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
03.12.03Continuous Monitoring
03.14.06System Monitoring

+149 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The CIS Controls v8 to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls your existing CIS Controls v8 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. CIS Controls v8 into NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 lands at 53.6%, while NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 into CIS Controls v8 lands at 41.8%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your CIS Controls v8 evidence buys you for NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3, the other asks the reverse.

CIS Controls v8 into NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3
53.6%

52 of 97 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for CIS Controls v8. 45 are genuine gaps.

50%03.01 AC (Access Control)
60%03.04 CM (Configuration Management)
75%03.05 IA (Identification and Authentication)
62.5%03.03 AU (Audit and Accountability)
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 129 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: 03.01.01 Account Management

A documented process grants access on hire and on privilege change, covering authorisation of accounts.

Grounded in CIS-6.1 Establish an Access Granting Process. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: 03.01.04 Separation of Duties

Identify duties that require separation; define system access authorizations to support separation of duties.

Every one of the 52 evidenced controls and 45 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 into CIS Controls v8
41.8%

64 of 153 CIS Controls v8 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. 89 are genuine gaps.

CIS Controls v8 to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 75% in the header counts how many CIS Controls v8 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (306K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CIS Controls v8 and NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?

CIS Controls v8 has 153 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 covers 97 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 115 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CIS Control 16: Application Software Security, where 9 CIS Controls v8 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 equivalent.

How many controls map between CIS Controls v8 and NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?

Of 153 total CIS Controls v8 controls, 115 map directly to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls, representing 75% coverage. The remaining 38 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CIS Controls v8 to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?

38 CIS Controls v8 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. The highest concentration of gaps is in CIS Control 16: Application Software Security with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CIS Controls v8 and NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?

The domain with the highest gap count is CIS Control 16: Application Software Security (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.