CIS Controls v8vsISO 27001:2022
See exactly how CIS Controls v8 controls map to ISO 27001:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which ISO 27001:2022 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CIS Controls v8 maps to ISO 27001:2022 with 100% coverage across 153 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 153 CIS Controls v8 controls identifies 0 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CIS Control 8: Audit Log Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 153 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 435 mapped controls across 18 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
CIS Control 1: Inventory and Control of Enterprise Assets(9 mappings)
CIS Control 10: Malware Defenses(11 mappings)
+415 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The CIS Controls v8 to ISO 27001:2022 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 27001:2022 controls your existing CIS Controls v8 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. CIS Controls v8 into ISO 27001:2022 lands at 50.5%, while ISO 27001:2022 into CIS Controls v8 lands at 66.7%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your CIS Controls v8 evidence buys you for ISO 27001:2022, the other asks the reverse.
47 of 93 ISO 27001:2022 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for CIS Controls v8. 46 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
A maintained data classification scheme is exactly this classification control.
Grounded in CIS-3.7 Establish and Maintain a Data Classification Scheme. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Write, approve and publish a top-level security policy plus topic-specific policies, and review them on a set cadence and after major change.
Every one of the 47 evidenced controls and 46 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
102 of 153 CIS Controls v8 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO 27001:2022. 51 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
An inventory of information and associated assets is the enterprise asset inventory.
Grounded in iso-27001-2022::5.9 Inventory of information and other associated assets. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Ensure that a process exists to address unauthorized assets on a weekly basis. The enterprise may choose to remove the asset from the network, deny the asset from connecting remotely to the network, or quarantine the asset.
Every one of the 102 evidenced controls and 51 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 100% in the header counts how many CIS Controls v8 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 27001:2022 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other CIS Controls v8 comparisons
Other ISO 27001:2022 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CIS Controls v8 and ISO 27001:2022?
CIS Controls v8 has 153 controls across its framework, while ISO 27001:2022 covers 93 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 153 overlapping controls (100% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CIS Control 8: Audit Log Management, where 0 CIS Controls v8 controls have no direct ISO 27001:2022 equivalent.
How many controls map between CIS Controls v8 and ISO 27001:2022?
Of 153 total CIS Controls v8 controls, 153 map directly to ISO 27001:2022 controls, representing 100% coverage. The remaining 0 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CIS Controls v8 to ISO 27001:2022?
0 CIS Controls v8 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27001:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in CIS Control 8: Audit Log Management with 0 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CIS Controls v8 and ISO 27001:2022?
The domain with the highest gap count is CIS Control 8: Audit Log Management (0 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.