Cross-Framework Mapping

China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)vsGDPR

See exactly how China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) controls map to GDPR. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

42
Controls Mapped
10
Gaps Found
73%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) maps to GDPR with 73% coverage across 38 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 52 China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in PIPL: Legal Liability (Ch VII).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 52 controls analysed | 719 frameworks | 428K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 42 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 428K+ mappings across 719 frameworks.

PIPL: PI Handling Rules (Ch II)(15 mappings)

PIPL-Art13Legal Bases for Handling
GDPR-Art.6Lawfulness of processing
PIPL-Art14Consent Requirements
GDPR-Art.7Conditions for consent
PIPL-Art15Right to Withdraw Consent
GDPR-Art.7Conditions for consent
PIPL-Art16No Coerced Consent / No Service Refusal
GDPR-Art.7Conditions for consent
PIPL-Art17Notice Content Before Handling2 targets
GDPR-Art.13Information to be provided where personal data are collected
GDPR-Art.14Information where personal data have not been obtained from the data subject
PIPL-Art19Retention Period Limitation
GDPR-Art.5Principles relating to processing of personal data
PIPL-Art20Joint Handlers
GDPR-Art.26Joint controllers
PIPL-Art21Entrusted Handling (Processors)
GDPR-Art.28Processor
PIPL-Art22Transfer Due to Merger or Restructuring
GDPR-Art.13Information to be provided where personal data are collected
PIPL-Art23Provision of PI to Third Parties
GDPR-Art.6Lawfulness of processing
PIPL-Art24Automated Decision-Making
GDPR-Art.22Automated individual decision-making, including profiling
PIPL-Art25Public Disclosure Prohibited Without Consent
GDPR-Art.6Lawfulness of processing
PIPL-Art26Image Collection in Public Places
GDPR-Art.6Lawfulness of processing
PIPL-Art27Handling Already-Disclosed PI
GDPR-Art.6Lawfulness of processing

PIPL: Sensitive PI (Ch II Sec 2)(5 mappings)

PIPL-Art28Sensitive PI Definition and Threshold
GDPR-Art.9Processing of special categories of personal data
PIPL-Art29Separate Consent for Sensitive PI
GDPR-Art.9Processing of special categories of personal data
PIPL-Art30Enhanced Notice for Sensitive PI
GDPR-Art.13Information to be provided where personal data are collected
PIPL-Art31Minors Under 14
GDPR-Art.8Conditions applicable to child's consent
PIPL-Art32Sectoral and Administrative Restrictions
GDPR-Art.9Processing of special categories of personal data

+22 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 719 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 719 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 719 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (428K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) and GDPR?

China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) has 52 controls across its framework, while GDPR covers 38 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 38 overlapping controls (73% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in PIPL: Legal Liability (Ch VII), where 4 China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) controls have no direct GDPR equivalent.

How many controls map between China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) and GDPR?

Of 52 total China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) controls, 38 map directly to GDPR controls — representing 73% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) to GDPR?

14 China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) controls have no direct equivalent in GDPR. The highest concentration of gaps is in PIPL: Legal Liability (Ch VII) with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) and GDPR?

The domain with the highest gap count is PIPL: Legal Liability (Ch VII) (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.