China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)vsChina Data Security Law (DSL)
See exactly how China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) controls map to China Data Security Law (DSL). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) maps to China Data Security Law (DSL) with 8% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 52 China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) controls identifies 48 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in PIPL: PI Handling Rules (Ch II).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 52 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 418K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 418K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.
PIPL: General Provisions (Ch I)(1 mappings)
PIPL: Cross-Border Provision (Ch III)(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 715 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (418K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) and China Data Security Law (DSL)?
China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) has 52 controls across its framework, while China Data Security Law (DSL) covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in PIPL: PI Handling Rules (Ch II), where 14 China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) controls have no direct China Data Security Law (DSL) equivalent.
How many controls map between China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) and China Data Security Law (DSL)?
Of 52 total China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) controls, 4 map directly to China Data Security Law (DSL) controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 48 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) to China Data Security Law (DSL)?
48 China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) controls have no direct equivalent in China Data Security Law (DSL). The highest concentration of gaps is in PIPL: PI Handling Rules (Ch II) with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) and China Data Security Law (DSL)?
The domain with the highest gap count is PIPL: PI Handling Rules (Ch II) (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.