China Data Security Law (DSL)vsGDPR
See exactly how China Data Security Law (DSL) controls map to GDPR. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
China Data Security Law (DSL) maps to GDPR with 5% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 China Data Security Law (DSL) controls identifies 20 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in China DSL: Data Security Protection Obligations (Chapter IV).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 418K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 418K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.
China DSL: Data Security Protection Obligations (Chapter IV)(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other China Data Security Law (DSL) comparisons
Other GDPR comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 715 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (418K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between China Data Security Law (DSL) and GDPR?
China Data Security Law (DSL) has 21 controls across its framework, while GDPR covers 38 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in China DSL: Data Security Protection Obligations (Chapter IV), where 6 China Data Security Law (DSL) controls have no direct GDPR equivalent.
How many controls map between China Data Security Law (DSL) and GDPR?
Of 21 total China Data Security Law (DSL) controls, 1 map directly to GDPR controls — representing 5% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping China Data Security Law (DSL) to GDPR?
20 China Data Security Law (DSL) controls have no direct equivalent in GDPR. The highest concentration of gaps is in China DSL: Data Security Protection Obligations (Chapter IV) with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between China Data Security Law (DSL) and GDPR?
The domain with the highest gap count is China DSL: Data Security Protection Obligations (Chapter IV) (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.