China Data Security Law (DSL)vsChina Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)
See exactly how China Data Security Law (DSL) controls map to China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
China Data Security Law (DSL) maps to China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) with 14% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 China Data Security Law (DSL) controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in China DSL: Data Security Protection Obligations (Chapter IV).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 716 frameworks | 430K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 430K+ mappings across 716 frameworks.
China DSL: General Provisions (Chapter I)(1 mappings)
China DSL: Data Security Protection Obligations (Chapter IV)(2 mappings)
China DSL: Government Data and Legal Liability (Chapters V-VII)(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other China Data Security Law (DSL) comparisons
Other China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 716 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 716 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (430K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between China Data Security Law (DSL) and China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)?
China Data Security Law (DSL) has 21 controls across its framework, while China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) covers 52 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in China DSL: Data Security Protection Obligations (Chapter IV), where 6 China Data Security Law (DSL) controls have no direct China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) equivalent.
How many controls map between China Data Security Law (DSL) and China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)?
Of 21 total China Data Security Law (DSL) controls, 3 map directly to China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping China Data Security Law (DSL) to China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)?
18 China Data Security Law (DSL) controls have no direct equivalent in China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL). The highest concentration of gaps is in China DSL: Data Security Protection Obligations (Chapter IV) with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between China Data Security Law (DSL) and China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)?
The domain with the highest gap count is China DSL: Data Security Protection Obligations (Chapter IV) (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.