TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)vsSpace ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework

See exactly how CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls map to Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) maps to Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework with 14% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Protocol Security Application.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Security Management and Operations(9 mappings)

SEC-5.1Security Policy Definition3 targets
→CT-1RF Interference and Jamming
→CT-2GNSS Spoofing
→CT-3Signal Interception
SEC-5.2Security Architecture Design3 targets
→CT-1RF Interference and Jamming
→CT-2GNSS Spoofing
→CT-3Signal Interception
SEC-5.4Incident Response for Space Systems3 targets
→CT-1RF Interference and Jamming
→CT-2GNSS Spoofing
→CT-3Signal Interception

Related Comparisons

Other CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) comparisons

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments11 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)11 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation11 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange11 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs ISO 2701710 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity10 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts10 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs FedRAMP Rev 510 mappings

Other Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework comparisons

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework6 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework4 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework4 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework3 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework3 mappingsRBI Cybersecurity Framework for Banks vs Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework3 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework3 mappingsITU Radio Regulations and Space Security Standards vs Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) and Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework?

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) has 21 controls across its framework, while Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Protocol Security Application, where 5 CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls have no direct Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework equivalent.

How many controls map between CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) and Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework?

Of 21 total CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls, 3 map directly to Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) to Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework?

18 CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls have no direct equivalent in Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in Protocol Security Application with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) and Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework?

The domain with the highest gap count is Protocol Security Application (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.