TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsSpace ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
97
Gaps Found
6%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework with 6% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 103 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 97 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 103 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

DE - Detect(1 mappings)

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-07Cyber threat intelligence and contextual information are integrated into analysis
→TI-3Indicator of Compromise Sharing

GV - Govern(1 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
→GT-3Supply Chain Compromise

ID - Identify(3 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained
→GT-3Supply Chain Compromise
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-02Cyber threat intelligence is received from information sharing forums
→TI-3Indicator of Compromise Sharing
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed on the basis of their risk
→GT-3Supply Chain Compromise

PR - Protect(1 mappings)

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-06Physical access to assets is managed, monitored, and enforced
→GT-2Physical Security Threats

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange21 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs CSA CCM v421 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)20 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ISO 27001:202220 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)20 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct19 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation19 mappings

Other Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework comparisons

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework6 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework4 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework4 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework3 mappingsRBI Cybersecurity Framework for Banks vs Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework3 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework3 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework3 mappingsITU Radio Regulations and Space Security Standards vs Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 103 controls across its framework, while Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (6% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 27 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework?

Of 103 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 6 map directly to Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework controls — representing 6% coverage. The remaining 97 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework?

97 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 27 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (27 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.