TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)vsISO 27017

See exactly how CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls map to ISO 27017. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
10
Gaps Found
48%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) maps to ISO 27017 with 48% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls identifies 11 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Protocol Security Application.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Security Threats and Risk Assessment(2 mappings)

SEC-1.2Risk Assessment Methodology
→ISO27017-03Cloud risk assessment
SEC-1.3Threat Categorization
→ISO27017-11Data classification for cloud

Authentication and Access Control(2 mappings)

SEC-2.1Telecommand Authentication
→ISO27017-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
SEC-2.3Data Origin Authentication
→ISO27017-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud

Encryption and Confidentiality(5 mappings)

SEC-3.1Space Data Link Encryption
→ISO27017-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
SEC-3.2Cryptographic Algorithm Standards
→ISO27017-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
SEC-3.3Authenticated Encryption2 targets
→ISO27017-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
→ISO27017-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
SEC-3.4Key Management
→ISO27017-12Encryption of cloud-stored data

Security Management and Operations(2 mappings)

SEC-5.1Security Policy Definition
→ISO27017-01Shared responsibility model definition
SEC-5.4Incident Response for Space Systems
→ISO27017-22Incident response in cloud

Related Comparisons

Other CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) comparisons

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments11 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)11 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation11 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange11 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity10 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts10 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs FedRAMP Rev 510 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)10 mappings

Other ISO 27017 comparisons

ISMAP (Japan) vs ISO 2701721 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701721 mappingsCAIQ (CSA) vs ISO 2701721 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs ISO 2701721 mappingsC5 (Germany) vs ISO 2701721 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs ISO 2701721 mappingsNIST SP 800-190 vs ISO 2701721 mappingsISO 27018 vs ISO 2701721 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) and ISO 27017?

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) has 21 controls across its framework, while ISO 27017 covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (48% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Protocol Security Application, where 5 CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls have no direct ISO 27017 equivalent.

How many controls map between CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) and ISO 27017?

Of 21 total CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls, 10 map directly to ISO 27017 controls — representing 48% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) to ISO 27017?

11 CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27017. The highest concentration of gaps is in Protocol Security Application with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) and ISO 27017?

The domain with the highest gap count is Protocol Security Application (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.