Cross-Framework Mapping

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)vsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation

See exactly how CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls map to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
52%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) maps to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation with 52% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Protocol Security Application.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Security Threats and Risk Assessment(7 mappings)

SEC-1.2Risk Assessment Methodology6 targets
CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process
CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment
GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy
SEC-1.3Threat Categorization
OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection

Authentication and Access Control(3 mappings)

SEC-2.1Telecommand Authentication
OMAN-PRO-01Identity and Access Management
SEC-2.2Ground Station Access Control
OMAN-PRO-01Identity and Access Management
SEC-2.3Data Origin Authentication
OMAN-PRO-01Identity and Access Management

Encryption and Confidentiality(5 mappings)

SEC-3.1Space Data Link Encryption
OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection
SEC-3.2Cryptographic Algorithm Standards
OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection
SEC-3.3Authenticated Encryption2 targets
OMAN-PRO-01Identity and Access Management
OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection
SEC-3.4Key Management
OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection

Security Management and Operations(4 mappings)

SEC-5.1Security Policy Definition2 targets
FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
SEC-5.4Incident Response for Space Systems2 targets
FAA-CS-4.2Incident Response
PNG-CC-CG-03Incident Response

Related Comparisons

Other CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) comparisons

Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) has 21 controls across its framework, while FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation covers 45 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (52% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Protocol Security Application, where 5 CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls have no direct FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

Of 21 total CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls, 11 map directly to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls — representing 52% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

10 CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls have no direct equivalent in FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Protocol Security Application with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is Protocol Security Application (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.