TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)vsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)

See exactly how CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls map to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
52%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) maps to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) with 52% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Protocol Security Application.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Security Threats and Risk Assessment(3 mappings)

SEC-1.2Risk Assessment Methodology2 targets
→AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment
→CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design
SEC-1.3Threat Categorization
→CSA-DATA-01Data Classification and Handling

Authentication and Access Control(3 mappings)

SEC-2.1Telecommand Authentication
→CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
SEC-2.2Ground Station Access Control
→CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
SEC-2.3Data Origin Authentication
→CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management

Encryption and Confidentiality(5 mappings)

SEC-3.1Space Data Link Encryption
→CSA-DATA-02Encryption and Key Management
SEC-3.2Cryptographic Algorithm Standards
→CSA-DATA-02Encryption and Key Management
SEC-3.3Authenticated Encryption2 targets
→CSA-DATA-02Encryption and Key Management
→CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
SEC-3.4Key Management
→CSA-DATA-02Encryption and Key Management

Security Management and Operations(3 mappings)

SEC-5.1Security Policy Definition2 targets
→CSA-INF-04Incident Management
→CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
SEC-5.4Incident Response for Space Systems
→CSA-INF-04Incident Management

Related Comparisons

Other CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) comparisons

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments11 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation11 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange11 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs ISO 2701710 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity10 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts10 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs FedRAMP Rev 510 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)10 mappings

Other CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)14 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)14 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)13 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)13 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)13 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)13 mappingsBIMCO Cyber Security vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)12 mappingsCAIQ (CSA) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)12 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) has 21 controls across its framework, while CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) covers 15 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (52% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Protocol Security Application, where 5 CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls have no direct CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) equivalent.

How many controls map between CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

Of 21 total CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls, 11 map directly to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls — representing 52% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

10 CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls have no direct equivalent in CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk). The highest concentration of gaps is in Protocol Security Application with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Protocol Security Application (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.