TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)vsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments

See exactly how CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls map to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

29
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
52%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) maps to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments with 52% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Protocol Security Application.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 29 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Security Threats and Risk Assessment(5 mappings)

SEC-1.2Risk Assessment Methodology3 targets
→KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
→NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
→NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
SEC-1.3Threat Categorization2 targets
→PAS1192-5-ST-01Security Triage Process
→PAS1192-5-ST-02Information Classification

Authentication and Access Control(7 mappings)

SEC-2.1Telecommand Authentication2 targets
→MARSE-SC-03Identity Verification
→PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls
SEC-2.2Ground Station Access Control3 targets
→CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue
→MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection
→PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls
SEC-2.3Data Origin Authentication2 targets
→MARSE-SC-03Identity Verification
→PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls

Encryption and Confidentiality(8 mappings)

SEC-3.1Space Data Link Encryption3 targets
→MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection
→NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
→PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls
SEC-3.2Cryptographic Algorithm Standards3 targets
→MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection
→NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
→PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls
SEC-3.3Authenticated Encryption2 targets
→MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection
→MARSE-SC-03Identity Verification

+9 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) comparisons

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)11 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation11 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange11 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs ISO 2701710 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity10 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts10 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs FedRAMP Rev 510 mappingsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)10 mappings

Other PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments comparisons

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments16 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) has 21 controls across its framework, while PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (52% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Protocol Security Application, where 5 CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls have no direct PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments equivalent.

How many controls map between CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

Of 21 total CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls, 11 map directly to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls — representing 52% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

10 CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls have no direct equivalent in PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. The highest concentration of gaps is in Protocol Security Application with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

The domain with the highest gap count is Protocol Security Application (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.