Cross-Framework Mapping

C2M2vsIEEE 1686

See exactly how C2M2 controls map to IEEE 1686. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

38
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
67%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

C2M2 maps to IEEE 1686 with 67% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 C2M2 controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in C2M2: Asset Identification & Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 38 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

C2M2: Asset Identification & Governance(2 mappings)

C2M2-02System security categorization
IEEE1686-02System security categorization
C2M2-05Security policy for operational technology
IEEE1686-05Security policy for operational technology

C2M2: Access Management(10 mappings)

C2M2-07Personnel risk assessment4 targets
IEEE1686-07Personnel risk assessment
IEEE1686-08Electronic access perimeter management
IEEE1686-09Interactive remote access security
IEEE1686-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
C2M2-08Electronic access perimeter management3 targets
IEEE1686-07Personnel risk assessment
IEEE1686-08Electronic access perimeter management
IEEE1686-09Interactive remote access security
C2M2-10Revocation of access procedures3 targets
IEEE1686-07Personnel risk assessment
IEEE1686-08Electronic access perimeter management
IEEE1686-09Interactive remote access security

C2M2: Systems Security(5 mappings)

C2M2-11Security patch management for OT
IEEE1686-11Security patch management for OT
C2M2-12Malware prevention for operational systems
IEEE1686-12Malware prevention for operational systems
C2M2-13Network security monitoring
IEEE1686-13Network security monitoring
C2M2-14System security hardening2 targets
IEEE1686-14System security hardening
IEEE1686-22Configuration management for OT systems

C2M2: Incident Response & Recovery(3 mappings)

C2M2-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions3 targets
IEEE1686-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions
IEEE1686-18Reporting obligations to authorities
IEEE1686-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents

+18 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between C2M2 and IEEE 1686?

C2M2 has 24 controls across its framework, while IEEE 1686 covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (67% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in C2M2: Asset Identification & Governance, where 3 C2M2 controls have no direct IEEE 1686 equivalent.

How many controls map between C2M2 and IEEE 1686?

Of 24 total C2M2 controls, 16 map directly to IEEE 1686 controls — representing 67% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping C2M2 to IEEE 1686?

8 C2M2 controls have no direct equivalent in IEEE 1686. The highest concentration of gaps is in C2M2: Asset Identification & Governance with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between C2M2 and IEEE 1686?

The domain with the highest gap count is C2M2: Asset Identification & Governance (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.