Cross-Framework Mapping

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational ResiliencevsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)

See exactly how BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls map to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience maps to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) with 16% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Implementation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Implementation(3 mappings)

BS65000-IM-03Continuous Improvement
ILO-FP-5.2Promotional Framework for OSH Convention (C187)
ISO-8000-IMP-02Quality Improvement
ILO-FP-5.2Promotional Framework for OSH Convention (C187)
PBD-IMP-03Organisational Integration
ILO-FP-5.2Promotional Framework for OSH Convention (C187)

Related Comparisons

Other BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience comparisons

Other ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience has 19 controls across its framework, while ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Implementation, where 13 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls have no direct ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) equivalent.

How many controls map between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

Of 19 total BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls, 3 map directly to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

16 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls have no direct equivalent in ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions). The highest concentration of gaps is in Implementation with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Implementation (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.