Cross-Framework Mapping

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9vsSQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food

See exactly how BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls map to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

27
Controls Mapped
1
Gaps Found
43%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 maps to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food with 43% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Product and Process Control.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 27 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Senior Management Commitment(3 mappings)

1.1Senior Management Commitment and Continual Improvement
2.5.2Verification Activities
1.2Food Safety and Quality Culture
2.2.2Records
1.3Organizational Structure and Responsibilities
2.2.2Records

Food Safety and Quality Management System(12 mappings)

3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual4 targets
2.1.1Management Policy
2.1.2Management Responsibility
2.1.3Food Safety and Quality Culture
2.5.2Verification Activities
3.2Document Control3 targets
2.1.1Management Policy
2.1.2Management Responsibility
2.1.3Food Safety and Quality Culture
3.3Record Completion and Maintenance
2.2.2Records
3.4Internal Audits3 targets
2.1.1Management Policy
2.1.2Management Responsibility
2.1.3Food Safety and Quality Culture
3.5Management of Suppliers
2.7.2Food Fraud Plan

Site Standards(5 mappings)

4.1External Standards3 targets
2.1.1Management Policy
2.1.2Management Responsibility
2.1.3Food Safety and Quality Culture
4.2Building Fabric and Facilities2 targets
2.1.1Management Policy
2.1.2Management Responsibility

+7 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 comparisons

Other SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 has 28 controls across its framework, while SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food covers 30 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Product and Process Control, where 5 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food equivalent.

How many controls map between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?

Of 28 total BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls, 12 map directly to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?

16 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct equivalent in SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food. The highest concentration of gaps is in Product and Process Control with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?

The domain with the highest gap count is Product and Process Control (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.