Cross-Framework Mapping

IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive ProductionvsSQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food

See exactly how IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls map to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
13
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production maps to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food with 32% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7 - Support.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Clause 10 - Improvement(2 mappings)

IATF-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
2.5.2Verification Activities
IATF-10.3Continual Improvement
2.2.2Records

Clause 4 - Context of the Organization(2 mappings)

IATF-4.4Quality Management System and Its Processes2 targets
2.5.2Verification Activities
2.5.4Product Sampling, Inspection, and Analysis

Clause 5 - Leadership(1 mappings)

IATF-5.3Organizational Roles, Responsibilities and Authorities
2.5.4Product Sampling, Inspection, and Analysis

Clause 6 - Planning(3 mappings)

IATF-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities3 targets
2.4.4Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment
2.5.4Product Sampling, Inspection, and Analysis
2.7.2Food Fraud Plan

Clause 8 - Operation(3 mappings)

IATF-8.1Operational Planning and Control2 targets
2.4.4Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment
2.7.2Food Fraud Plan
IATF-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products and Services
2.7.2Food Fraud Plan

Clause 9 - Performance Evaluation(1 mappings)

IATF-9.2Internal Audit
2.2.2Records

Related Comparisons

Other IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production comparisons

Other SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production and SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?

IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production has 25 controls across its framework, while SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food covers 30 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7 - Support, where 4 IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls have no direct SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food equivalent.

How many controls map between IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production and SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?

Of 25 total IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls, 8 map directly to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?

17 IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls have no direct equivalent in SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7 - Support with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production and SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7 - Support (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.