TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsSQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
17
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food with 29% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Access Control and Identification(4 mappings)

3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual4 targets
→2.1.1Management Policy
→2.1.2Management Responsibility
→2.1.3Food Safety and Quality Culture
→2.5.2Verification Activities

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(6 mappings)

3.11Risk Assessment2 targets
→2.4.4Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment
→2.7.2Food Fraud Plan
3.3Record Completion and Maintenance
→2.2.2Records
3.4Internal Audits3 targets
→2.1.1Management Policy
→2.1.2Management Responsibility
→2.1.3Food Safety and Quality Culture

Incident Response and Media Protection(3 mappings)

3.16System and Services Acquisition
→2.7.2Food Fraud Plan
3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
→2.7.2Food Fraud Plan
3.5Management of Suppliers
→2.7.2Food Fraud Plan

Awareness, Training, and Personnel(3 mappings)

3.2Document Control3 targets
→2.1.1Management Policy
→2.1.2Management Responsibility
→2.1.3Food Safety and Quality Culture

System Protection and Communications(2 mappings)

FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→2.2.2Records
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
→2.2.2Records

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202121 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange20 mappings

Other SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food comparisons

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food8 mappingsISO/IEC 27003:2017 vs SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food8 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food8 mappingsUS OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework vs SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food7 mappingsPIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products vs SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food7 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food6 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food6 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food covers 30 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 13 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 10 map directly to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements to SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?

25 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.