TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9vsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments

See exactly how BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls map to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
23
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 maps to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments with 14% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Product and Process Control.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Senior Management Commitment(2 mappings)

1.2Food Safety and Quality Culture
→NRC73-CTL-01Access Control for CDAs
1.3Organizational Structure and Responsibilities
→NRC73-CTL-01Access Control for CDAs

Food Safety and Quality Management System(3 mappings)

3.3Record Completion and Maintenance
→NRC73-CTL-01Access Control for CDAs
3.5Management of Suppliers2 targets
→NRC73-CTL-05Supply Chain Security for CDAs
→PAS1192-5-SC-02Personnel Security

Related Comparisons

Other BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 comparisons

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR)12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs ISO/IEC 27003:201712 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements12 mappings

Other PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments comparisons

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments16 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 has 28 controls across its framework, while PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Product and Process Control, where 6 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments equivalent.

How many controls map between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

Of 28 total BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls, 4 map directly to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

24 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct equivalent in PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. The highest concentration of gaps is in Product and Process Control with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

The domain with the highest gap count is Product and Process Control (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.