TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9vsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)

See exactly how BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls map to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
25
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 maps to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) with 11% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Product and Process Control.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Senior Management Commitment(2 mappings)

1.2Food Safety and Quality Culture
→AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance
1.3Organizational Structure and Responsibilities
→AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance

Food Safety and Quality Management System(1 mappings)

3.3Record Completion and Maintenance
→AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance

Related Comparisons

Other BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 comparisons

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR)12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs ISO/IEC 27003:201712 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements12 mappings

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)17 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)17 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)16 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 has 28 controls across its framework, while AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Product and Process Control, where 6 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) equivalent.

How many controls map between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

Of 28 total BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls, 3 map directly to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

25 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct equivalent in AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). The highest concentration of gaps is in Product and Process Control with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Product and Process Control (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.