Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 37001:2016vsAS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence

See exactly how ISO 37001:2016 controls map to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
35
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 37001:2016 maps to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 15% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 41 ISO 37001:2016 controls identifies 35 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Operation – ISO 37001:2016.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 41 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Improvement – ISO 37001:2016(1 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
AS9100D2016-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action

Leadership – ISO 37001:2016(2 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::5.1Leadership and commitment
AS9100D2016-5.1Leadership and Commitment
iso-37001-2016::5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
AS9100D2016-5.3Roles, Responsibilities, Authorities

Clause 6 – ISO 37001:2016(1 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
AS9100D2016-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities

Support – ISO 37001:2016(1 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::7.5Documented information
AS9100D2016-7.5Documented Information

Operation – ISO 37001:2016(1 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::8.1Operational planning and control
AS9100D2016-8.1Operational Planning and Control
Coverage crosswalk

A ISO 37001:2016 to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls your existing ISO 37001:2016 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

ISO 37001:2016 into AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence into ISO 37001:2016
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO 37001:2016 to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 15% in the header counts how many ISO 37001:2016 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 37001:2016 and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

ISO 37001:2016 has 41 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation – ISO 37001:2016, where 9 ISO 37001:2016 controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 37001:2016 and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

Of 41 total ISO 37001:2016 controls, 6 map directly to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls, representing 15% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 37001:2016 to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

35 ISO 37001:2016 controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation – ISO 37001:2016 with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 37001:2016 and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation – ISO 37001:2016 (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.