TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Azure Security BenchmarkvsEASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation

See exactly how Azure Security Benchmark controls map to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Azure Security Benchmark maps to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation with 8% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 Azure Security Benchmark controls identifies 23 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Azure Security Benchmark: Identity & Access in Cloud.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Azure Security Benchmark: Cloud Governance(2 mappings)

ASB-03Cloud risk assessment2 targets
→IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
→IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment

Azure Security Benchmark: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(3 mappings)

ASB-22Incident response in cloud3 targets
→IS.AR.215Information Security Incident Response
→IS.D.OR.225External Reporting of Information Security Events
→IS.I.OR.225External Reporting

Related Comparisons

Other Azure Security Benchmark comparisons

Azure Security Benchmark vs NIST SP 800-14520 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs MTCS (Singapore)20 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs ISO 2701720 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs C5 (Germany)20 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST SP 800-14620 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs ISMAP (Japan)20 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST SP 800-19020 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs ISO 2701820 mappings

Other EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation9 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation9 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation9 mappingsC2M2 vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsNIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsAPI 1164 vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsEU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Azure Security Benchmark and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

Azure Security Benchmark has 25 controls across its framework, while EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Azure Security Benchmark: Identity & Access in Cloud, where 5 Azure Security Benchmark controls have no direct EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between Azure Security Benchmark and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

Of 25 total Azure Security Benchmark controls, 2 map directly to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 23 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Azure Security Benchmark to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

23 Azure Security Benchmark controls have no direct equivalent in EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Azure Security Benchmark: Identity & Access in Cloud with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Azure Security Benchmark and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is Azure Security Benchmark: Identity & Access in Cloud (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.