Cross-Framework Mapping

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)vsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements

See exactly how Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls map to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
10
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) maps to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements with 7% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions(4 mappings)

AT-DSG-6Sections 12-13 — Video Surveillance (CCTV)4 targets
33CFR105.305Facility Security Assessment
33CFR105.400Facility Security Plan (FSP)
33CFR105.405Format and Content of FSP
IR-4Continuous Monitoring

Related Comparisons

Other Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) comparisons

Other US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) has 14 controls across its framework, while US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions, where 4 Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls have no direct US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

Of 14 total Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls, 1 map directly to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

13 Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls have no direct equivalent in US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.