Cross-Framework Mapping

Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)vsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
17
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 15% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Privacy Program and Accountability.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Part 1 - Consideration of Personal Information Privacy(1 mappings)

APP-1APP 1 - Open and transparent management of personal information
FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Part 2 - Collection of Personal Information(2 mappings)

APP-3APP 3 - Collection of solicited personal information
FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)
APP-5APP 5 - Notification of the collection of personal information
FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Related Comparisons

Other Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) comparisons

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) has 20 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Privacy Program and Accountability, where 7 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 20 total Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) controls, 3 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

17 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Privacy Program and Accountability with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Privacy Program and Accountability (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.