Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)vsVirginia CDPA
See exactly how Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) controls map to Virginia CDPA. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) maps to Virginia CDPA with 20% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Privacy Program and Accountability.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Part 1 - Consideration of Personal Information Privacy(1 mappings)
Part 2 - Collection of Personal Information(2 mappings)
Part 3 - Dealing with Personal Information(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) comparisons
Other Virginia CDPA comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) and Virginia CDPA?
Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) has 20 controls across its framework, while Virginia CDPA covers 6 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Privacy Program and Accountability, where 7 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) controls have no direct Virginia CDPA equivalent.
How many controls map between Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) and Virginia CDPA?
Of 20 total Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) controls, 4 map directly to Virginia CDPA controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) to Virginia CDPA?
16 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) controls have no direct equivalent in Virginia CDPA. The highest concentration of gaps is in Privacy Program and Accountability with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) and Virginia CDPA?
The domain with the highest gap count is Privacy Program and Accountability (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.