TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)vsEASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation

See exactly how Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls map to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

32
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
31%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) maps to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation with 31% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls identifies 27 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 32 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Event and Incident Response(9 mappings)

AESCSF-IR-1Incident Response Plan3 targets
→IS.AR.215Information Security Incident Response
→IS.D.OR.225External Reporting of Information Security Events
→IS.I.OR.225External Reporting
AESCSF-IR-2Incident Response Capability3 targets
→IS.AR.215Information Security Incident Response
→IS.D.OR.225External Reporting of Information Security Events
→IS.I.OR.225External Reporting
AESCSF-IR-3Incident Reporting3 targets
→IS.AR.215Information Security Incident Response
→IS.D.OR.225External Reporting of Information Security Events
→IS.I.OR.225External Reporting

Supply Chain and Dependencies(3 mappings)

AESCSF-SC-1Supply Chain Risk Management3 targets
→IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management

Threat and Vulnerability Management(5 mappings)

AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment2 targets
→IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
→IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence3 targets
→IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management

Risk Management(3 mappings)

CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process2 targets
→IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
→IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment
→IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment

+12 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) comparisons

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs CSA CCM v424 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)22 mappings

Other EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation9 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation9 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation9 mappingsC2M2 vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsNIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsAPI 1164 vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsEU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) has 39 controls across its framework, while EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (31% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 10 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls have no direct EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

Of 39 total Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls, 12 map directly to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation controls — representing 31% coverage. The remaining 27 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

27 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls have no direct equivalent in EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.