Australia My Health Records Act 2012vsFedRAMP Moderate
See exactly how Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls map to FedRAMP Moderate. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which FedRAMP Moderate controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Australia My Health Records Act 2012 maps to FedRAMP Moderate with 45% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls identifies 22 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Registration and Participation.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 60 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
Collection, Use and Disclosure(4 mappings)
Breach and Enforcement(8 mappings)
Governance(2 mappings)
Registration and Participation(6 mappings)
+40 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The Australia My Health Records Act 2012 to FedRAMP Moderate crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FedRAMP Moderate controls your existing Australia My Health Records Act 2012 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. Australia My Health Records Act 2012 into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 8%, while FedRAMP Moderate into Australia My Health Records Act 2012 lands at 22.5%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your Australia My Health Records Act 2012 evidence buys you for FedRAMP Moderate, the other asks the reverse.
26 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for Australia My Health Records Act 2012. 297 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Mandates a written policy governing security of and access to the record system.
Grounded in MYHR-SEC-1 Written security and access policy. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Prevent further access by initiating device lock after 15 minutes inactivity (FedRAMP) or upon user request.
Every one of the 26 evidenced controls and 297 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
9 of 40 Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 31 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Mandatory external incident reporting to authorities within a fixed timeframe is the notification mechanism.
Grounded in IR-6 Incident Reporting. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Collect, use and disclose health information in a My Health Record only as authorised by the Act (Part 4 Div 2).
Every one of the 9 evidenced controls and 31 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 45% in the header counts how many Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FedRAMP Moderate controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other Australia My Health Records Act 2012 comparisons
Other FedRAMP Moderate comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Australia My Health Records Act 2012 and FedRAMP Moderate?
Australia My Health Records Act 2012 has 40 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Moderate covers 323 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (45% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Registration and Participation, where 7 Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls have no direct FedRAMP Moderate equivalent.
How many controls map between Australia My Health Records Act 2012 and FedRAMP Moderate?
Of 40 total Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls, 18 map directly to FedRAMP Moderate controls, representing 45% coverage. The remaining 22 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia My Health Records Act 2012 to FedRAMP Moderate?
22 Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Moderate. The highest concentration of gaps is in Registration and Participation with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia My Health Records Act 2012 and FedRAMP Moderate?
The domain with the highest gap count is Registration and Participation (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.