TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)vsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements

See exactly how Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls map to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
39
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) maps to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements with 14% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls identifies 43 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Compliance and Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Privacy and Security Safeguards(2 mappings)

CDR-12Breach Notification2 targets
→CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
→CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan

Compliance and Enforcement(9 mappings)

EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme
→IR-2Incident Documentation
EU-EAA-CE-02Market Surveillance
→IR-4Continuous Monitoring
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
→IR-2Incident Documentation
HBNR-ENF-01Record-Keeping Requirements
→IR-2Incident Documentation
NDB-DATA-BREACH-PLANData breach response plan2 targets
→CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
→CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting3 targets
→CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
→CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan
→VES-3Penetration Testing

Related Comparisons

Other Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) comparisons

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)18 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs EU Digital Markets Act18 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs FTC Health Breach Notification Rule18 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry17 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555)17 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security17 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework17 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs CSA CCM v416 mappings

Other US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) has 50 controls across its framework, while US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Compliance and Enforcement, where 32 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls have no direct US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

Of 50 total Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls, 7 map directly to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 43 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

43 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls have no direct equivalent in US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Compliance and Enforcement with 32 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Compliance and Enforcement (32 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.