TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)vsSOC 2

See exactly how Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls map to SOC 2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

26
Controls Mapped
24
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) maps to SOC 2 with 20% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls identifies 40 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Compliance and Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 26 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Compliance and Enforcement(14 mappings)

CA-AODA-CE-02Accessibility Policy and Plan3 targets
→SOC2-A1.1Maintains capacity to meet availability commitments
→SOC2-A1.2Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability
→SOC2-A1.3Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures
EU-EAA-CE-02Market Surveillance3 targets
→SOC2-A1.1Maintains capacity to meet availability commitments
→SOC2-A1.2Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability
→SOC2-A1.3Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures
NDB-DATA-BREACH-PLANData breach response plan2 targets
→SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures
→SOC2-CC7.5Identifies the root cause of security incidents
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting2 targets
→SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures
→SOC2-CC7.5Identifies the root cause of security incidents
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-03Penalties2 targets
→SOC2-CC6.2Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established
→SOC2-CC6.3Role-based access and least privilege are enforced
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting2 targets
→SOC2-CC4.2COSO principle 17: Evaluates and communicates deficiencies in a timely manner
→SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures

Privacy and Security Safeguards(5 mappings)

CDR-11Data Minimization3 targets
→SOC2-P3.1Personal information is collected consistent with privacy commitments
→SOC2-P4.3Personal information is securely disposed of
→SOC2-P6.1Personal information is disclosed to third parties only as committed
CDR-12Breach Notification2 targets
→SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures
→SOC2-CC7.5Identifies the root cause of security incidents

Consent and Authorization(1 mappings)

CDR-2Authorization Process
→SOC2-CC6.2Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established

+6 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) comparisons

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)18 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs EU Digital Markets Act18 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs FTC Health Breach Notification Rule18 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry17 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555)17 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security17 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework17 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs CSA CCM v416 mappings

Other SOC 2 comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs SOC 213 mappingsSSAE 18 — Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs SOC 213 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs SOC 212 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs SOC 212 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs SOC 211 mappingsEU Digital Markets Act vs SOC 211 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs SOC 211 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs SOC 211 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and SOC 2?

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) has 50 controls across its framework, while SOC 2 covers 54 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Compliance and Enforcement, where 32 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls have no direct SOC 2 equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and SOC 2?

Of 50 total Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls, 10 map directly to SOC 2 controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 40 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) to SOC 2?

40 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls have no direct equivalent in SOC 2. The highest concentration of gaps is in Compliance and Enforcement with 32 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and SOC 2?

The domain with the highest gap count is Compliance and Enforcement (32 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.