Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)vsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5

See exactly how Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
17
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) maps to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 with 21% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls identifies 22 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Privacy Safeguards.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Information Security (Schedule 2)(11 mappings)

AUCDR-IS-1Limit risk of unauthorised access to the CDR data environment2 targets
NIST800-AC-2Account management
NIST800-AC-6Least privilege
AUCDR-IS-2Secure the network and systems within the data environment3 targets
NIST800-CM-6Configuration settings
NIST800-SC-28Protection of information at rest
NIST800-SC-7Boundary protection
AUCDR-IS-3Securely manage information assets over their lifecycle2 targets
NIST800-CM-8System component inventory
NIST800-MP-6Media sanitization
AUCDR-IS-4Formal vulnerability management program2 targets
NIST800-RA-5Vulnerability monitoring and scanning
NIST800-SI-2Flaw remediation
AUCDR-IS-5Limit, prevent, detect and remove malware
NIST800-SI-3Malicious code protection
AUCDR-IS-6Information security training and awareness program
NIST800-AT-2Literacy training and awareness

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) has 28 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 covers 192 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Privacy Safeguards, where 13 Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

Of 28 total Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls, 6 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 22 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

22 Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in Privacy Safeguards with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is Privacy Safeguards (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.