TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)vsGDPR

See exactly how Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls map to GDPR. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) maps to GDPR with 25% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Privacy Safeguards.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

CDR Rules Obligations(3 mappings)

AUCDR-OB-3Data minimisation
→GDPR-Art.25Data protection by design and by default
AUCDR-OB-6Records of CDR data
→GDPR-Art.30Records of processing activities
AUCDR-OB-9Outsourced service provider and representative arrangements
→GDPR-Art.28Processor

Privacy Safeguards(5 mappings)

AUCDR-PS-1Privacy Safeguard 1 - Open and transparent management of CDR data
→GDPR-Art.24Responsibility of the controller
AUCDR-PS-12Privacy Safeguard 12 - Security of CDR data and destruction or de-identification of redundant CDR data
→GDPR-Art.32Security of processing
AUCDR-PS-2Privacy Safeguard 2 - Anonymity and pseudonymity
→GDPR-Art.11Processing which does not require identification
AUCDR-PS-8Privacy Safeguard 8 - Overseas disclosure of CDR data2 targets
→GDPR-Art.44General principle for transfers
→GDPR-Art.45Transfers on the basis of an adequacy decision

Related Comparisons

Other Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) comparisons

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) vs Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)18 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) vs APRA CPS 2347 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 56 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.06 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) vs Brazil Open Finance (Resolução Conjunta No. 1/2020)4 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) vs ACSC Essential Eight3 mappings

Other GDPR comparisons

Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL) vs GDPR22 mappingsAICPA Privacy Management Framework (PMF) vs GDPR20 mappingsAlbania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) vs GDPR18 mappingsAPPI vs GDPR18 mappingsChina Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) vs GDPR15 mappingsAustralian Privacy Principles (APPs) vs GDPR14 mappingsArmenia Law on Protection of Personal Data (2015) vs GDPR14 mappingsBahrain PDPL vs GDPR13 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) and GDPR?

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) has 28 controls across its framework, while GDPR covers 27 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Privacy Safeguards, where 9 Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls have no direct GDPR equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) and GDPR?

Of 28 total Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls, 7 map directly to GDPR controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) to GDPR?

21 Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls have no direct equivalent in GDPR. The highest concentration of gaps is in Privacy Safeguards with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) and GDPR?

The domain with the highest gap count is Privacy Safeguards (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.