Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)vsGDPR
See exactly how Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls map to GDPR. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which GDPR controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) maps to GDPR with 100% coverage across 24 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls identifies 0 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Information Security (Schedule 2).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 46 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
Information Security (Schedule 2)(13 mappings)
Privacy Safeguards(7 mappings)
+26 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) to GDPR crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which GDPR controls your existing Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) into GDPR lands at 35%, while GDPR into Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) lands at 58.3%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) evidence buys you for GDPR, the other asks the reverse.
14 of 40 GDPR controls are evidenced by work you have already done for Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR). 26 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Data managed openly and transparently under a clearly expressed current policy.
Grounded in AUCDR-PS-1 Privacy Safeguard 1 - Open and transparent management of CDR data. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Process personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences, or related security measures, only under the control of official authority or where Union or Member State law authorises the processing and provides appropriate...
Every one of the 14 evidenced controls and 26 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
14 of 24 Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls are evidenced by work you have already done for GDPR. 10 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Awareness raising and training of staff involved in processing is a standing duty.
Grounded in GDPR-Art.39 Tasks of the data protection officer. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Have processes to limit the risk of inappropriate or unauthorised access to the CDR data environment, including MFA or equivalent, restriction of administrative privileges, audit logging and monitoring, access security, limiting physical...
Every one of the 14 evidenced controls and 10 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 100% in the header counts how many Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many GDPR controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) comparisons
Other GDPR comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) and GDPR?
Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) has 24 controls across its framework, while GDPR covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 24 overlapping controls (100% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security (Schedule 2), where 0 Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls have no direct GDPR equivalent.
How many controls map between Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) and GDPR?
Of 24 total Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls, 24 map directly to GDPR controls, representing 100% coverage. The remaining 0 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) to GDPR?
0 Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls have no direct equivalent in GDPR. The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security (Schedule 2) with 0 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) and GDPR?
The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (Schedule 2) (0 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.