TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)vsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)

See exactly how Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls map to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
47
Gaps Found
6%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) maps to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) with 6% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls identifies 47 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Compliance and Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Consent and Authorization(2 mappings)

CDR-2Authorization Process
→ILO-FP-1.1Freedom of Association (C87)
CDR-3Consent Withdrawal
→ILO-FP-1.1Freedom of Association (C87)

Compliance and Enforcement(1 mappings)

US-ITAR-EAR-CE-03Penalties
→ILO-FP-1.1Freedom of Association (C87)

Related Comparisons

Other Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) comparisons

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)18 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs EU Digital Markets Act18 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs FTC Health Breach Notification Rule18 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry17 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555)17 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security17 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework17 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs CSA CCM v416 mappings

Other ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) comparisons

ASEAN Data Management Framework vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsVoluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsEU Better Internet for Kids (BIK+) Strategy vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsGerman Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) has 50 controls across its framework, while ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (6% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Compliance and Enforcement, where 37 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls have no direct ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

Of 50 total Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls, 3 map directly to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls — representing 6% coverage. The remaining 47 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

47 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls have no direct equivalent in ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions). The highest concentration of gaps is in Compliance and Enforcement with 37 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Compliance and Enforcement (37 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.