TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk ManagementvsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements

See exactly how APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls map to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
40
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management maps to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements with 9% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 47 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls identifies 51 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Service Provider Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 47 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 415K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 415K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.

Operational Risk Management Framework(3 mappings)

CPS230-11Risk Identification and Assessment
→IR-2Incident Response and Recovery
CPS230-13Board Accountability2 targets
→CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
→CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan

Governance(2 mappings)

CPS230-13Board Accountability2 targets
→CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
→CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan

Critical Operations(1 mappings)

CPS230-22Vulnerability and Gap Identification
→VES-3Penetration Testing

Business Continuity(1 mappings)

CPS230-28Recovery Objectives
→CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan

Related Comparisons

Other APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management comparisons

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 526 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs South Korea ISMS-P11 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions11 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)11 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments10 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)10 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges10 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)10 mappings

Other US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsTISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements8 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements8 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements8 mappingsMARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements8 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements8 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements8 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements8 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 715 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (415K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management has 47 controls across its framework, while US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Service Provider Management, where 12 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

Of 47 total APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, 5 map directly to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 51 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

51 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Service Provider Management with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Service Provider Management (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.