TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk ManagementvsIEEE 1686

See exactly how APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls map to IEEE 1686. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
30
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management maps to IEEE 1686 with 17% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 47 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls identifies 46 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Business Continuity.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 47 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Operational Risk Management Framework(4 mappings)

CPS230-11Risk Identification and Assessment2 targets
→IEEE1686-IR-Recovery-Reporting-Exercises-Drills-RECOVIEEE 1686 - Incident Response + Recovery from Failed Update + Reporting to Authorities + Coordination with Sector-Specific Agencies + Exercises and Drills
→IEEE1686-Section5.1-AccessControl-Accounts-Roles-Password-Session-RemoteIEEE 1686 Section 5.1 - Electronic Access Account Management + Roles + Password + Failed Login + Session + Remote Access + Personnel
CPS230-13Board Accountability
→IEEE1686-IR-Recovery-Reporting-Exercises-Drills-RECOVIEEE 1686 - Incident Response + Recovery from Failed Update + Reporting to Authorities + Coordination with Sector-Specific Agencies + Exercises and Drills
CPS230-16Internal Audit Review
→IEEE1686-SupplyChain-Documentation-Procurement-ComplianceTable-PhysicalIEEE 1686 Section 6 IED Security Documentation + Supply Chain + Procurement Specification + Appendix A Compliance Table + Physical and Tamper

Governance(1 mappings)

CPS230-13Board Accountability
→IEEE1686-IR-Recovery-Reporting-Exercises-Drills-RECOVIEEE 1686 - Incident Response + Recovery from Failed Update + Reporting to Authorities + Coordination with Sector-Specific Agencies + Exercises and Drills

Operations(3 mappings)

CPS230-27Incident Management3 targets
→IEEE1686-IR-Recovery-Reporting-Exercises-Drills-RECOVIEEE 1686 - Incident Response + Recovery from Failed Update + Reporting to Authorities + Coordination with Sector-Specific Agencies + Exercises and Drills
→IEEE1686-Section5.5-5.6-5.7-5.8-Firmware-ConfigSW-TimeSync-DataAtRestIEEE 1686 Section 5.5-5.8 - Firmware Quality + Configuration Software Security + Time Synchronisation + Data Protection at Rest + Patch + Malware + Hardening + Vulnerability
→IEEE1686-SupplyChain-Documentation-Procurement-ComplianceTable-PhysicalIEEE 1686 Section 6 IED Security Documentation + Supply Chain + Procurement Specification + Appendix A Compliance Table + Physical and Tamper

Business Continuity(4 mappings)

CPS230-27Incident Management3 targets
→IEEE1686-IR-Recovery-Reporting-Exercises-Drills-RECOVIEEE 1686 - Incident Response + Recovery from Failed Update + Reporting to Authorities + Coordination with Sector-Specific Agencies + Exercises and Drills
→IEEE1686-Section5.5-5.6-5.7-5.8-Firmware-ConfigSW-TimeSync-DataAtRestIEEE 1686 Section 5.5-5.8 - Firmware Quality + Configuration Software Security + Time Synchronisation + Data Protection at Rest + Patch + Malware + Hardening + Vulnerability
→IEEE1686-SupplyChain-Documentation-Procurement-ComplianceTable-PhysicalIEEE 1686 Section 6 IED Security Documentation + Supply Chain + Procurement Specification + Appendix A Compliance Table + Physical and Tamper
CPS230-28Recovery Objectives
→IEEE1686-IR-Recovery-Reporting-Exercises-Drills-RECOVIEEE 1686 - Incident Response + Recovery from Failed Update + Reporting to Authorities + Coordination with Sector-Specific Agencies + Exercises and Drills

Service Provider Management(5 mappings)

CPS230-37Service Provider Management Policy
→IEEE1686-SupplyChain-Documentation-Procurement-ComplianceTable-PhysicalIEEE 1686 Section 6 IED Security Documentation + Supply Chain + Procurement Specification + Appendix A Compliance Table + Physical and Tamper
CPS230-46Ongoing Risk Management
→IEEE1686-SupplyChain-Documentation-Procurement-ComplianceTable-PhysicalIEEE 1686 Section 6 IED Security Documentation + Supply Chain + Procurement Specification + Appendix A Compliance Table + Physical and Tamper
CPS230-49Internal Audit of Service Providers3 targets
→IEEE1686-IR-Recovery-Reporting-Exercises-Drills-RECOVIEEE 1686 - Incident Response + Recovery from Failed Update + Reporting to Authorities + Coordination with Sector-Specific Agencies + Exercises and Drills
→IEEE1686-Section5.5-5.6-5.7-5.8-Firmware-ConfigSW-TimeSync-DataAtRestIEEE 1686 Section 5.5-5.8 - Firmware Quality + Configuration Software Security + Time Synchronisation + Data Protection at Rest + Patch + Malware + Hardening + Vulnerability
→IEEE1686-SupplyChain-Documentation-Procurement-ComplianceTable-PhysicalIEEE 1686 Section 6 IED Security Documentation + Supply Chain + Procurement Specification + Appendix A Compliance Table + Physical and Tamper

Related Comparisons

Other APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management comparisons

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 526 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs FedRAMP Rev 59 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs Annex 11 to EU GMP - Computerised Systems9 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs NIST Privacy Framework8 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs NIS2 Directive8 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs NERC CIP8 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements8 mappings

Other IEEE 1686 comparisons

IEC 62443 vs IEEE 16866 mappingsAPI 1164 vs IEEE 16866 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs IEEE 16866 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs IEEE 16866 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs IEEE 16865 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IEEE 16865 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs IEEE 16865 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs IEEE 16865 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and IEEE 1686?

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management has 47 controls across its framework, while IEEE 1686 covers 7 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Business Continuity, where 10 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct IEEE 1686 equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and IEEE 1686?

Of 47 total APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, 10 map directly to IEEE 1686 controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 46 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to IEEE 1686?

46 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in IEEE 1686. The highest concentration of gaps is in Business Continuity with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and IEEE 1686?

The domain with the highest gap count is Business Continuity (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.