Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk ManagementvsCOSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)

See exactly how APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls map to COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
34
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management maps to COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) with 7% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls identifies 40 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Business Continuity.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Operational Risk Management Framework(3 mappings)

CPS230-16Internal Audit Review3 targets
Principle 17Pursues Improvement in ERM
Principle 18Leverages Information and Technology
Principle 19Communicates Risk Information

Service Provider Management(6 mappings)

CPS230-37Service Provider Management Policy3 targets
Principle 17Pursues Improvement in ERM
Principle 18Leverages Information and Technology
Principle 19Communicates Risk Information
CPS230-46Ongoing Risk Management3 targets
Principle 17Pursues Improvement in ERM
Principle 18Leverages Information and Technology
Principle 19Communicates Risk Information

Related Comparisons

Other APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management comparisons

Other COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)?

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management has 43 controls across its framework, while COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Business Continuity, where 12 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)?

Of 43 total APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, 3 map directly to COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 40 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)?

40 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017). The highest concentration of gaps is in Business Continuity with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Business Continuity (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.