Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk ManagementvsSouth Korea ISMS-P

See exactly how APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls map to South Korea ISMS-P. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
30
Gaps Found
26%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management maps to South Korea ISMS-P with 26% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls identifies 32 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Service Provider Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Operational Risk Management Framework(4 mappings)

CPS230-11Risk Identification and Assessment2 targets
ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management
ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management
CPS230-13Incident Management
ISMSP-SYS-05Incident Response
CPS230-16Internal Audit Review
ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management

Critical Operations(1 mappings)

CPS230-22Vulnerability and Gap Identification
ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management

Business Continuity(5 mappings)

CPS230-25Business Continuity Policy
ISMSP-SYS-06Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
CPS230-26Business Continuity Plans
ISMSP-SYS-06Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
CPS230-27BCP Scope
ISMSP-PI-03Third-Party Provision and Outsourcing
CPS230-28Recovery Objectives2 targets
ISMSP-PI-06Personal Information Destruction
ISMSP-SYS-06Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

Service Provider Management(3 mappings)

CPS230-37Service Provider Management Policy
ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management
CPS230-46Ongoing Risk Management
ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management
CPS230-49Internal Audit of Service Providers
ISMSP-PI-03Third-Party Provision and Outsourcing

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and South Korea ISMS-P?

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management has 43 controls across its framework, while South Korea ISMS-P covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Service Provider Management, where 10 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct South Korea ISMS-P equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and South Korea ISMS-P?

Of 43 total APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, 11 map directly to South Korea ISMS-P controls — representing 26% coverage. The remaining 32 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to South Korea ISMS-P?

32 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in South Korea ISMS-P. The highest concentration of gaps is in Service Provider Management with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and South Korea ISMS-P?

The domain with the highest gap count is Service Provider Management (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.