APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk ManagementvsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)
See exactly how APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls map to Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management maps to Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) with 26% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls identifies 32 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Service Provider Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 22 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Operational Risk Management Framework(5 mappings)
Critical Operations(1 mappings)
Business Continuity(9 mappings)
Service Provider Management(5 mappings)
+2 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management comparisons
Other Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)?
APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management has 43 controls across its framework, while Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Service Provider Management, where 10 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) equivalent.
How many controls map between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)?
Of 43 total APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, 11 map directly to Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) controls — representing 26% coverage. The remaining 32 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)?
32 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8). The highest concentration of gaps is in Service Provider Management with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Service Provider Management (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.