Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 220 Risk ManagementvsEASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation

See exactly how APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls map to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 220 Risk Management maps to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Assessment and Reporting.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Risk Governance and Oversight(6 mappings)

CPS220-GOV-3Three Lines of Defence3 targets
IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management
CPS220-GOV-4Risk Management Declaration3 targets
IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management

Risk Assessment and Reporting(5 mappings)

CPS220-RAR-1Material Risk Identification2 targets
IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
CPS220-RAR-4Risk Reporting3 targets
IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 220 Risk Management and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

APRA CPS 220 Risk Management has 8 controls across its framework, while EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Assessment and Reporting, where 2 APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls have no direct EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 220 Risk Management and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

Of 8 total APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls, 4 map directly to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 220 Risk Management to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

4 APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Assessment and Reporting with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 220 Risk Management and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Assessment and Reporting (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.