Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 220 Risk ManagementvsCDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project)

See exactly how APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls map to CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 220 Risk Management maps to CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Assessment and Reporting.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Risk Governance and Oversight(6 mappings)

CPS220-GOV-3Three Lines of Defence3 targets
FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management
FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management
GAMP5-1.1Risk-Based Approach
CPS220-GOV-4Risk Management Declaration3 targets
FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management
FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management
GAMP5-1.1Risk-Based Approach

Risk Assessment and Reporting(6 mappings)

CPS220-RAR-1Material Risk Identification3 targets
CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process
CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment
GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment
CPS220-RAR-4Risk Reporting3 targets
FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management
FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management
GAMP5-1.1Risk-Based Approach

Related Comparisons

Other APRA CPS 220 Risk Management comparisons

Other CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 220 Risk Management and CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project)?

APRA CPS 220 Risk Management has 8 controls across its framework, while CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Assessment and Reporting, where 2 APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls have no direct CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 220 Risk Management and CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project)?

Of 8 total APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls, 4 map directly to CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 220 Risk Management to CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project)?

4 APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project). The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Assessment and Reporting with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 220 Risk Management and CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Assessment and Reporting (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.