ACSC Essential EightvsFedRAMP Moderate
See exactly how ACSC Essential Eight controls map to FedRAMP Moderate. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which FedRAMP Moderate controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ACSC Essential Eight maps to FedRAMP Moderate with 96% coverage across 24 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 ACSC Essential Eight controls identifies 0 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Regular Backups.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 96 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
Restrict Administrative Privileges(20 mappings)
+76 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The ACSC Essential Eight to FedRAMP Moderate crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FedRAMP Moderate controls your existing ACSC Essential Eight work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. ACSC Essential Eight into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 9.6%, while FedRAMP Moderate into ACSC Essential Eight lands at 75%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your ACSC Essential Eight evidence buys you for FedRAMP Moderate, the other asks the reverse.
31 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ACSC Essential Eight. 292 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Privileged access is limited to duties required and revalidated, with unused access disabled.
Grounded in E8-ADMIN-ML3 Restrict Administrative Privileges (ML3). Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Develop and disseminate access control policy and procedures; review at least annually (FedRAMP parameter); update following defined events.
Every one of the 31 evidenced controls and 292 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
18 of 24 ACSC Essential Eight controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 6 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Privileged accounts restricted to defined personnel evidences validation of privileged access.
Grounded in AC-6(5) Privileged Accounts. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
All ML1 requirements plus: Privileged user accounts (excluding backup administrator accounts) cannot access backups belonging to other user accounts. Privileged user accounts (excluding backup administrator accounts) are prevented from...
Every one of the 18 evidenced controls and 6 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 96% in the header counts how many ACSC Essential Eight controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FedRAMP Moderate controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other ACSC Essential Eight comparisons
Other FedRAMP Moderate comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ACSC Essential Eight and FedRAMP Moderate?
ACSC Essential Eight has 24 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Moderate covers 323 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 24 overlapping controls (96% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Regular Backups, where 0 ACSC Essential Eight controls have no direct FedRAMP Moderate equivalent.
How many controls map between ACSC Essential Eight and FedRAMP Moderate?
Of 24 total ACSC Essential Eight controls, 24 map directly to FedRAMP Moderate controls, representing 96% coverage. The remaining 0 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ACSC Essential Eight to FedRAMP Moderate?
0 ACSC Essential Eight controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Moderate. The highest concentration of gaps is in Regular Backups with 0 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ACSC Essential Eight and FedRAMP Moderate?
The domain with the highest gap count is Regular Backups (0 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.