Cross-Framework Mapping

ACSC Essential EightvsISO 27002:2022

See exactly how ACSC Essential Eight controls map to ISO 27002:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

198
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
98%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which ISO 27002:2022 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ACSC Essential Eight maps to ISO 27002:2022 with 98% coverage across 172 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 176 ACSC Essential Eight controls identifies 33 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in The maturity model, its implementation and assessment – ACSC Essential Eight.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 176 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 198 mapped controls across 9 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

Superseded batch representation – ACSC Essential Eight(20 mappings)

E8-ADMIN-ML1Restrict Administrative Privileges (ML1)4 targets
→iso-27002-2022::5.16Identity management
→iso-27002-2022::5.3Segregation of duties
→iso-27002-2022::8.18Use of privileged utility programs
→iso-27002-2022::8.2Privileged access rights
E8-ADMIN-ML2Restrict Administrative Privileges (ML2)7 targets
→iso-27002-2022::5.17Authentication information
→iso-27002-2022::5.18Access rights
→iso-27002-2022::5.24Information security incident management planning and preparation
→iso-27002-2022::5.26Response to information security incidents
→iso-27002-2022::5.27Learning from information security incidents
→iso-27002-2022::8.15Logging
→iso-27002-2022::8.2Privileged access rights
E8-ADMIN-ML3Restrict Administrative Privileges (ML3)2 targets
→iso-27002-2022::8.2Privileged access rights
→iso-27002-2022::8.3Information access restriction
E8-APP-ML1Application Control (ML1)3 targets
→iso-27002-2022::8.18Use of privileged utility programs
→iso-27002-2022::8.19Installation of software on operational systems
→iso-27002-2022::8.7Protection against malware
E8-APP-ML2Application Control (ML2)4 targets
→iso-27002-2022::5.25Assessment and decision on information security events
→iso-27002-2022::5.5Contact with authorities
→iso-27002-2022::6.8Information security event reporting
→iso-27002-2022::8.15Logging

+178 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The ACSC Essential Eight to ISO 27002:2022 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 27002:2022 controls your existing ACSC Essential Eight work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

ACSC Essential Eight into ISO 27002:2022
12.9%

12 of 93 ISO 27002:2022 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ACSC Essential Eight. 81 are genuine gaps.

ISO 27002:2022 into ACSC Essential Eight
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ACSC Essential Eight to ISO 27002:2022
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 98% in the header counts how many ACSC Essential Eight controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 27002:2022 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ACSC Essential Eight and ISO 27002:2022?

ACSC Essential Eight has 176 controls across its framework, while ISO 27002:2022 covers 93 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 172 overlapping controls (98% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in The maturity model, its implementation and assessment – ACSC Essential Eight, where 5 ACSC Essential Eight controls have no direct ISO 27002:2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between ACSC Essential Eight and ISO 27002:2022?

Of 176 total ACSC Essential Eight controls, 172 map directly to ISO 27002:2022 controls, representing 98% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ACSC Essential Eight to ISO 27002:2022?

33 ACSC Essential Eight controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27002:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in The maturity model, its implementation and assessment – ACSC Essential Eight with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ACSC Essential Eight and ISO 27002:2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is The maturity model, its implementation and assessment – ACSC Essential Eight (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.