Cross-Framework Mapping

3GPP SecurityvsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements

See exactly how 3GPP Security controls map to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
28
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

3GPP Security maps to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements with 10% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 3GPP Security controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in 3GPP Security: Communications Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

3GPP Security: Access Control(1 mappings)

3GPP-SEC-13Authentication and password management
CYB-2Account Security Measures

3GPP Security: Operations Security(2 mappings)

3GPP-SEC-23Backup and recovery procedures
CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan
3GPP-SEC-25Technical vulnerability management
VES-3Penetration Testing

Related Comparisons

Other 3GPP Security comparisons

Other US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between 3GPP Security and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

3GPP Security has 31 controls across its framework, while US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in 3GPP Security: Communications Security, where 5 3GPP Security controls have no direct US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between 3GPP Security and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

Of 31 total 3GPP Security controls, 3 map directly to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP Security to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

28 3GPP Security controls have no direct equivalent in US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in 3GPP Security: Communications Security with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP Security and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is 3GPP Security: Communications Security (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.