HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)
The HKMA's framework for Hong Kong banks to rate their inherent cyber risk, prove the matching maturity against control principles in 26 components across seven domains (baseline for low, intermediate for medium, advanced for high inherent risk) and, at medium or high risk, run intelligence-led attack simulation testing with red and blue teams. The 2.0 matrix itself is issued to banks privately.
HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) is a compliance framework from Hong Kong SAR (authorized institutions supervised by the HKMA) with 8 domains and 96 controls that map to 94 other frameworks. The largest domains are Conducting the assessment: inherent risk, maturity and iCAST – HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) (18 controls), Domain 3: Protection – HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) (18 controls), Domain 1: Governance – HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) (15 controls). Every control below carries what it requires and what an assessor expects to see.
Framework summaries on this platform are interpretations grounded in the published source, for educational and compliance planning purposes. They do not reproduce or replace the official standards. Refer to the authoritative source for the definitive text. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective organisations.
Framework Domains (8)
Conducting the assessment: inherent risk, maturity and iCAST – HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)
| Code | Title |
|---|---|
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::GEN.1 | Regular C-RAF assessment by every authorized institution |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::GEN.2 | Assessment scope: systems supporting the Hong Kong business |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::GEN.3 | Qualified and competent assessors and testers |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::GEN.4 | Documentary evidence retained and open to HKMA validation |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::GEN.5 | Sign-off by the Chief Executive and the assessor |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::GEN.6 | Improvement plan and closure of gaps |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::ICAST.1 | iCAST for medium and high inherent risk institutions |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::ICAST.2 | iCAST control group |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::ICAST.3 | iCAST scoping: key functions, critical systems and test goals |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::ICAST.4 | iCAST threat intelligence report |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::ICAST.5 | iCAST testing scenarios |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::ICAST.6 | iCAST testing and progress communication |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::ICAST.7 | iCAST reporting and management endorsement |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::ICAST.8 | Blue team requirements in iCAST 2.0 |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::IRA.1 | Inherent risk profile across the five categories |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::IRA.2 | Overall inherent risk level and the minimum required maturity |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::MA.1 | Maturity assessment against the applicable control principles |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::MA.2 | Maturity attainment summary and gap identification |
Domain 1: Governance – HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)
Domain 2: Identification – HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)
| Code | Title |
|---|---|
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::2.1.A | 2.1 IT asset management: advanced level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::2.1.B | 2.1 IT asset management: baseline level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::2.1.I | 2.1 IT asset management: intermediate level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::2.2.A | 2.2 Cyber risk identification, assessment, treatment and monitoring: advanced level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::2.2.B | 2.2 Cyber risk identification, assessment, treatment and monitoring: baseline level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::2.2.I | 2.2 Cyber risk identification, assessment, treatment and monitoring: intermediate level |
Domain 3: Protection – HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)
Domain 4: Detection – HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)
| Code | Title |
|---|---|
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::4.1.A | 4.1 Vulnerability detection: advanced level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::4.1.B | 4.1 Vulnerability detection: baseline level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::4.1.I | 4.1 Vulnerability detection: intermediate level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::4.2.A | 4.2 Anomalies activity detection: advanced level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::4.2.B | 4.2 Anomalies activity detection: baseline level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::4.2.I | 4.2 Anomalies activity detection: intermediate level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::4.3.A | 4.3 Cyber incident detection: advanced level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::4.3.B | 4.3 Cyber incident detection: baseline level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::4.3.I | 4.3 Cyber incident detection: intermediate level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::4.4.A | 4.4 Threat monitoring and analysis: advanced level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::4.4.B | 4.4 Threat monitoring and analysis: baseline level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::4.4.I | 4.4 Threat monitoring and analysis: intermediate level |
Domain 5: Response and recovery – HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)
| Code | Title |
|---|---|
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::5.1.A | 5.1 Governance and preparation of incident response and recovery: advanced level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::5.1.B | 5.1 Governance and preparation of incident response and recovery: baseline level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::5.1.I | 5.1 Governance and preparation of incident response and recovery: intermediate level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::5.2.A | 5.2 Analysis, mitigation and restoration: advanced level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::5.2.B | 5.2 Analysis, mitigation and restoration: baseline level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::5.2.I | 5.2 Analysis, mitigation and restoration: intermediate level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::5.3.A | 5.3 Cyber forensics: advanced level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::5.3.B | 5.3 Cyber forensics: baseline level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::5.3.I | 5.3 Cyber forensics: intermediate level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::5.4.A | 5.4 Communication and improvement: advanced level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::5.4.B | 5.4 Communication and improvement: baseline level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::5.4.I | 5.4 Communication and improvement: intermediate level |
Domain 6: Situational awareness – HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)
| Code | Title |
|---|---|
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::6.1.A | 6.1 Threat intelligence: advanced level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::6.1.B | 6.1 Threat intelligence: baseline level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::6.1.I | 6.1 Threat intelligence: intermediate level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::6.2.A | 6.2 Threat intelligence sharing: advanced level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::6.2.B | 6.2 Threat intelligence sharing: baseline level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::6.2.I | 6.2 Threat intelligence sharing: intermediate level |
Domain 7: Third-party risk management – HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)
| Code | Title |
|---|---|
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::7.1.A | 7.1 External connections: advanced level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::7.1.B | 7.1 External connections: baseline level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::7.1.I | 7.1 External connections: intermediate level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::7.2.A | 7.2 Third-party management: advanced level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::7.2.B | 7.2 Third-party management: baseline level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::7.2.I | 7.2 Third-party management: intermediate level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::7.3.A | 7.3 Ongoing monitoring of third-party risk: advanced level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::7.3.B | 7.3 Ongoing monitoring of third-party risk: baseline level |
| hkma-cyber-resilience-assessment-framework-c-raf::7.3.I | 7.3 Ongoing monitoring of third-party risk: intermediate level |
Your Compliance Coverage
If you comply with HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF), you already cover:
Ghana Cybersecurity Act
3%
3 controls mapped
Compare →US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) - Higher Education Safeguards Rule
3%
3 controls mapped
Compare →TEFCA - Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement
3%
3 controls mapped
Compare →+ 91 more: Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) (3%), OWASP ASVS (3%)
See all 94 mapped frameworks ↓Maps to 94 other frameworks
Coverage is not the same as your position
This page shows what HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) overlaps with in general. Where your organisation actually stands, against the standard you are going for and the certifications you already hold, is a different question. Same graph and the same recorded refutations, scoped to you rather than to a pair.
The Compliance Position Diagnostic, $5,000 fixed, ten business daysWhat is HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and who does it apply to?
HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) is a compliance framework from Hong Kong SAR (authorized institutions supervised by the HKMA) with 8 domains and 96 controls. The HKMA's framework for Hong Kong banks to rate their inherent cyber risk, prove the matching maturity against control principles in 26 components across seven domains (baseline for low, intermediate for medium, advanced for high inherent risk) and, at medium or high risk, run intelligence-led attack simulation testing with red and blue teams. The 2.0 matrix itself is issued to banks privately. It is used by organisations to establish and maintain compliance with industry standards and regulatory requirements.
What does HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) actually require?
HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) has 96 controls organised across 8 domains. The largest domains are Conducting the assessment: inherent risk, maturity and iCAST – HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) (18 controls), Domain 3: Protection – HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) (18 controls), Domain 1: Governance – HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) (15 controls). Each control defines specific requirements that organisations must implement to achieve compliance.
If I already comply with another framework, how much of HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) do I already cover?
HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) maps to 94 other compliance frameworks. The top mapping partners are Ghana Cybersecurity Act (3% coverage), US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) - Higher Education Safeguards Rule (3% coverage), TEFCA - Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (3% coverage). Use our comparison tool to explore control-level mappings between frameworks.
How do I implement HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
Start your HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) compliance journey by running a self-assessment on our platform to identify your current compliance posture. Our AI advisory can answer specific questions about HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) requirements, and cross-framework mapping helps you leverage existing controls from other frameworks you may already comply with. Create a free account to access all 96 controls and track your progress.
Start Your Compliance Journey
Create a free account to run self-assessments, get AI advisory, and track your compliance progress across 1,121 frameworks.
Get Started Free →Free forever, no credit card required