NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
ID - Identify

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09: The authenticity and integrity of hardware and software are assessed prior to acquisition and use

The authenticity and integrity of hardware and software are assessed prior to acquisition and use

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 189 controls across 100 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 7 controls

FedRAMP High · 6 controls

  • AU-6 Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
  • CA-2(1) Independent Assessors
  • CA-2(3) Control Assessments | Leveraging Results from External Organizations (CA-2(3))
  • CA-7(4) Continuous Monitoring | Risk Monitoring (CA-7(4))
  • RA-1 Policy and Procedures
  • RA-3 Risk Assessment

FedRAMP Moderate · 6 controls

  • AU-6 Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
  • CA-2(1) Independent Assessors
  • CA-2(3) Control Assessments | Leveraging Results from External Organizations (CA-2(3))
  • CA-7(4) Continuous Monitoring | Risk Monitoring (CA-7(4))
  • RA-1 Policy and Procedures
  • RA-3 Risk Assessment

SOC 2 · 6 controls

  • SOC2-CC2.1 CC2.1 Relevant, quality information to support internal control (COSO principle 13)
  • SOC2-CC3.1 CC3.1 Objectives specified clearly enough to assess risk (COSO principle 6)
  • SOC2-CC3.2 CC3.2 Identifying and analysing risks to objectives (COSO principle 7)
  • SOC2-CC3.4 CC3.4 Identifying and assessing significant changes (COSO principle 9)
  • SOC2-CC4.1 CC4.1 Ongoing and separate evaluations of control (COSO principle 16)
  • SOC2-CC4.2 CC4.2 Evaluating and communicating control deficiencies (COSO principle 17)

ISO 27701:2019 · 5 controls

  • 5.6.2 Information security risk assessment
  • 5.7.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
  • 5.7.2 Internal audit
  • 6.9.4 Logging and monitoring
  • 7.4.3 Accuracy and quality

BSI IT-Grundschutz · 3 controls

  • BSI-13 Risk assessment procedures
  • BSI-15 Security categorization
  • BSI-17 Continuous monitoring strategy

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 · 3 controls

  • ISO23894-6.3 AI Risk Assessment
  • ISO23894-6.3.1 AI Risk Identification
  • ISO23894-6.3.3 AI Risk Evaluation

ISO/IEC 29134:2023 · 3 controls

  • 29134-1 Scope
  • 29134-3 Terms and definitions
  • 29134-9.1 PIA report structure

NIST SP 800-30 · 3 controls

  • NISTSP30-3 Threat Source and Threat Event Identification
  • NISTSP30-4 Vulnerability and Predisposing Condition Identification
  • NISTSP30-6 Risk Determination, Uncertainty, and Sensitivity Analysis
  • RMI-DD-2 Supply Chain Information Collection
  • RMI-SEG-2 Environmental Standards
  • RMI-SEG-3 OHS and Governance
  • SSAE18-CC3.1 CC3.1 - COSO Principle 6: Risk Identification
  • SSAE18-CC3.2 CC3.2 - COSO Principle 7: Risk Analysis
  • SSAE18-SOC1-02 Risk Assessment

API 1164 · 2 controls

  • API1164-07 Remote Access
  • API1164-24 Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
  • CPS220-16 Management Information System and Data Framework
  • CPS220-P35 Required Content of Risk Management Policies and Procedures
  • IS.D.OR.205 Information Security Risk Assessment
  • IS.I.OR.205 Information Security Risk Assessment
  • Sapin2-Pillar3-Risk-Mapping Pillar 3 - Corruption Risk Mapping (Cartographie des Risques)
  • Sapin2-Pillar4-ThirdParty-DueDiligence Pillar 4 - Third-Party Due Diligence (Clients, Suppliers, Intermediaries, M&A)
  • ICAO-ANX17-Chap2-ThreatAssessment-RiskManagement-Cyber-GASeP ICAO Annex 17 Chapter 2 - Threat Assessment + Risk Management + Cyber Threats to Critical Aviation Systems (Amendment 17/18)
  • ICAO-ANX17-Chap4-Cargo-Mail-Catering-Stores-Supplies-RegulatedAgent-KnownConsignor ICAO Annex 17 Chapter 4 - Cargo + Mail + Catering + Stores + Supplies Security + Regulated Agent + Known Consignor + Supply Chain

IEC 62443 · 2 controls

  • IEC62443-07 Personnel risk assessment
  • IEC62443-24 Vulnerability assessment for critical systems

ISO/IEC 27003:2017 · 2 controls

  • ISO27003-6.1 Actions to address risks and opportunities
  • ISO27003-8.2 Information security risk assessment

ISO/IEC 27019:2024 · 2 controls

  • ISO27019-07 Personnel risk assessment
  • ISO27019-24 Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
  • 27557-4.3 Individual impact consideration
  • 27557-6.3 Privacy risk assessment

NIST SP 1800-32 · 2 controls

NIST SP 800-37 · 2 controls

  • NISTSP37-2 RMF Categorize Step: Information and System Categorisation
  • NISTSP37-3 RMF Select Step: Security and Privacy Control Selection
  • NZISM-1 NZISM Governance, Documentation, and Classification System
  • NZISM-3 Personnel Security, Physical Security, and Cryptography
  • ORSA-S1 Guidance Manual Section 1: Description of the insurer's risk management framework
  • ORSA-S2 Guidance Manual Section 2: Insurer's assessment of risk exposures
  • 2.4.4 Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment
  • 2.7.2 Food Fraud Plan

South Korea ISMS-P · 2 controls

  • ISMSP-MS-02 Risk Management
  • ISMSP-SYS-04 Vulnerability Management
  • CH-FADP-21 Data protection impact assessments
  • FADP-7 Data Protection Impact Assessment (Articles 9-10)
  • CRM-1 AML/CFT Compliance
  • CRM-4 Business Risk Assessment
  • UNESCO-AI-PA1 Ethical Impact Assessment
  • UNESCOAI-1 Principles 1-3: Proportionality, Safety, Fairness
  • AMLCTF-PartA-RiskAssess ML/TF Risk Assessment
  • CPS230-11 Identification, Assessment and Management of Operational Risk
  • SPS220-22 Framework Enabling Strategies, Policies, Procedures and Controls
  • 4.3.1 Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis
  • ISM-1967 ASD assessment of TOP SECRET systems

Bahrain PDPL · 1 control

  • BB-DPA-20 Sections 50-60 - Registration and Responsibilities
  • CJIS-17 Risk Assessment
  • UAE-PDPL-Art.18_19_20_21 Security measures, controller/processor relationship, DPIA (UAE PDPL Articles 18-21)

GDPR · 1 control

  • ISO-22313-8.2 Business impact analysis and risk assessment
  • ISO-26262-3-7 Hazard analysis and risk assessment (HARA)

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.35 Independent review of information security

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.35 Independent review of information security

ISO 27799:2025 · 1 control

  • ISO27799-06 Security management process and risk analysis

ISO/IEC 27031:2011 · 1 control

  • 27031-7.2 Resource Requirements

ISO/IEC 29147:2018 · 1 control

  • 29147-5.11 Researcher Safe Harbour and Legal Posture

NIS2 Directive · 1 control

  • Art.21.2.f Policies and procedures to assess the effectiveness of the cybersecurity risk-management measures
  • PR.DS-8 PR.DS-8: Integrity checking mechanisms are used to verify hardware integrity
  • NISTPF-8 Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)

NIST SP 800-122 · 1 control

  • NISTSP122-8 Continuous Monitoring, Training, and Privacy Programme Governance

NIST SP 800-144 · 1 control

  • NISTSP144-1 Cloud Governance, Risk Assessment, and Provider Trust Evaluation

NIST SP 800-145 · 1 control

  • NISTSP145-7 Cloud Procurement Standards Aligned to NIST SP 800-145 Definition

NIST SP 800-146 · 1 control

  • NISTSP146-1 Cloud Adoption Strategy, Workload Suitability, and Decision Framework

NIST SP 800-190 · 1 control

NIST SP 800-39 · 1 control

  • NISTSP39-3 Risk Assessing: Organisation, Mission, and System Level Assessments

NIST SP 800-66 · 1 control

  • NISTSP66-1 Security Management Process: Risk Analysis and Risk Management for ePHI
  • NISTSP82-2 OT Risk Assessment and Threat/Vulnerability Identification
  • NRFCS-2 Risk Assessment, Customer Data Inventory, Classification, and Retail Threat Model
  • NJDPA-7 Data Protection Assessments and Processor Contracts
  • NGOB-1 Open Banking Registry Participation, Tiered Categorisation, and KYP

OECD AI Principles · 1 control

  • OECDAI-3 Robustness, Security, Safety, and Adversarial Attack Protection
  • OREGONCPA-5 Data Protection Assessments, Privacy by Design, Security Practices

PDPA Singapore · 1 control

  • PDPASG-4 Children's Data, DPIA, and Privacy by Design

PDPA Thailand · 1 control

  • PDPATH-4 DPIA, Privacy by Design, Children's Data

POPIA · 1 control

  • POPIASA-4 Special Personal Information, Children, Information Quality, Documentation
  • NORWAY-4 DPIA, Privacy by Design, Records of Processing

Privacy Act 2020 · 1 control

  • NZPRV-6 IPP 13 Unique Identifiers, Privacy Impact Assessment, Privacy by Design

Qatar DPL · 1 control

  • QATAR-7 DPO, Records, Retention, Marketing, Training
  • PICERL-P2 Risk Assessment
  • SECCLIM-2 Risk Management: Identification, Assessment, Integration
  • SOC-CY-DC5 Risk Assessment Process

Saudi Arabia PDPL · 1 control

  • SA-PDPL-21 Data protection impact assessments
  • SOCI-S30CU Vulnerability assessments
  • SCA-S10 Annual Risk Assessment
  • IM8-SEC.4 Vulnerability Management

South Korea PIPA · 1 control

  • PIPA-CPO-DPO-Privacy-Officer-PIA-Personal-Information-Impact-Assessment-Articles-31-33 Korea PIPA CPO + DPO + Privacy Officer + PIA + Personal Information Impact Assessment + Articles 31-33
  • TSAPIPE-1 Cybersecurity Implementation Plan and Coordinator

Taiwan PDPA · 1 control

  • TAIWAN-3 Data Subject Rights
  • TEXASTDPSA-3 Sensitive Data, Children, Sale Notice
  • UKAI-1 Risk-Based Approach and Pro-Innovation Principles
  • Standard 2 Data Protection Impact Assessments
  • UKOPRES-3 Self-Assessment and Board Engagement
  • UKGDPRREG-3 Controller and Processor (Articles 24-43)
  • s.54(5) Statement Content Requirements
  • SEMD-SP-2 Risk Identification and Assessment
  • UNICEFAI-4 Transparency, Explanation, Adult Capacity
  • CPSC-RA.3 Lifecycle Risk Assessment

Uruguay DPL · 1 control

  • URUGUAY-5 Database Registration with AGESIC URCDP

Vietnam PDPD · 1 control

  • VIETNAMPDP-3 Data Subject Rights

Virginia CDPA · 1 control

  • VIRGINIAVCDPA-3 Sensitive Data Consent and Children

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in ID - Identify

You are reading one control. How much of NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 have you already done?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 73 of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 174 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 189 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.