ISO 27002:2022
Organizational controls – ISO 27002:2022

ISO 27002:2022 5.29: Information security during disruption

The organization is to plan how it will keep information security at a suitable level while operations are disrupted. Purpose: protect information and associated assets during disruption. Guidance: work out how security controls need to be adapted during disruption and build security requirements into business continuity management. Develop, put in place, test, review and evaluate plans that keep or restore the security of information supporting critical business processes after an interruption or failure, recovering it to the required level within the required time. Implement and maintain security controls and their supporting systems and tools within the business and ICT continuity plans, processes that keep existing security controls working during disruption, and compensating controls for any that cannot be kept running. Other information: continuity planning may call for security requirements that differ from normal operation depending on the type of disruption; the impact analysis and risk assessment done for continuity should weigh and prioritize loss of confidentiality and integrity as well as availability; ISO 22301, ISO 22313 and ISO/TS 22317 give further guidance.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykControl text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 123 controls across 28 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ISO 22301:2019 · 17 controls

  • 6.1.2 Addressing risks and opportunities
  • 6.2.1 Establishing business continuity objectives
  • 6.2.2 Determining business continuity objectives
  • 8.1 Operational planning and control
  • 8.2 Business impact analysis and risk assessment
  • 8.2.2 Business impact analysis
  • 8.3 Business continuity strategies and solutions
  • 8.3.1 General
  • 8.3.2 Identification of strategies and solutions
  • 8.3.3 Selection of strategies and solutions
  • 8.4 Business continuity plans and procedures
  • 8.4.1 General
  • 8.4.3 Warning and communication
  • 8.4.4 Business continuity plans
  • 8.4.5 Recovery
  • 8.6 Evaluation of business continuity documentation and capabilities
  • 9.2.1 General

FedRAMP High · 16 controls

  • CP-1 Policy and Procedures
  • CP-10 System Recovery and Reconstitution
  • CP-2 Contingency Plan
  • CP-2(1) Coordinate with Related Plans
  • CP-2(3) Resume Mission and Business Functions
  • CP-6(1) Alternate Storage Site | Separation from Primary Site (CP-6(1))
  • CP-6(3) Alternate Storage Site | Accessibility (CP-6(3))
  • CP-7 Alternate Processing Site
  • CP-7(2) Alternate Processing Site | Accessibility (CP-7(2))
  • CP-7(3) Alternate Processing Site | Priority of Service (CP-7(3))
  • CP-8 Telecommunications Services
  • CP-8(1) Telecommunications Services | Priority of Service Provisions (CP-8(1))
  • CP-8(2) Telecommunications Services | Single Points of Failure (CP-8(2))
  • IR-3 Incident Response Testing
  • PE-17 Alternate Work Site
  • SC-7(18) Boundary Protection | Fail Secure (SC-7(18))

FedRAMP Moderate · 16 controls

  • CP-1 Policy and Procedures
  • CP-10 System Recovery and Reconstitution
  • CP-2 Contingency Plan
  • CP-2(1) Coordinate with Related Plans
  • CP-2(3) Resume Mission and Business Functions
  • CP-6(1) Alternate Storage Site | Separation from Primary Site (CP-6(1))
  • CP-6(3) Alternate Storage Site | Accessibility (CP-6(3))
  • CP-7 Alternate Processing Site
  • CP-7(2) Alternate Processing Site | Accessibility (CP-7(2))
  • CP-7(3) Alternate Processing Site | Priority of Service (CP-7(3))
  • CP-8 Telecommunications Services
  • CP-8(1) Telecommunications Services | Priority of Service Provisions (CP-8(1))
  • CP-8(2) Telecommunications Services | Single Points of Failure (CP-8(2))
  • IR-3 Incident Response Testing
  • PE-17 Alternate Work Site
  • SC-7(18) Boundary Protection | Fail Secure (SC-7(18))

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 14 controls

  • NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08 Incidents are declared when adverse events meet the defined incident criteria
  • NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03 Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations
  • NIST-CSF-RC.CO-03 Recovery activities and progress in restoring operational capabilities are communicated to designated internal and external stakeholders
  • NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01 The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed once initiated from the incident response process
  • NIST-CSF-RC.RP-02 Recovery actions are selected, scoped, prioritized, and performed
  • NIST-CSF-RC.RP-04 Critical mission functions and cybersecurity risk management are considered to establish post-incident operational norms
  • NIST-CSF-RS.MA-01 The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties once an incident is declared
  • NIST-CSF-RS.MA-05 The criteria for initiating incident recovery are applied
  • CPS230-20 Prevention, Adaptation and Return to Normal Operations
  • CPS230-26 Critical Operations Register, Continuity Plan and Activation
  • CPS230-34 Tailoring of the Testing Program
  • CPS230-P18 Integration with the Risk Management Framework and Recovery Planning
  • CPS230-P40 Required Content of the Business Continuity Plan
  • CPS230-P45 Annual Update of the Business Continuity Plan

SOC 2 · 6 controls

  • SOC2-A1.2 A1.2 Environmental protection, backup and recovery infrastructure
  • SOC2-A1.3 A1.3 Testing recovery plan procedures
  • SOC2-CC3.4 CC3.4 Identifying and assessing significant changes (COSO principle 9)
  • SOC2-CC5.1 CC5.1 Selecting control activities that mitigate risk (COSO principle 10)
  • SOC2-CC7.4 CC7.4 Responding to security incidents
  • SOC2-CC9.1 CC9.1 Mitigating risks of business disruption

ISO 27001:2022 · 5 controls

  • 5.24 Information security incident management planning and preparation 
  • 5.29 Information security during disruption
  • 5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity
  • 8.13 Information backup
  • 8.14 Redundancy of information processing facilities

HIPAA Security Rule · 4 controls

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 4 controls

  • ISM-0734 CISO contribution to continuity and recovery planning
  • ISM-1610 Documenting and testing emergency access
  • CFTC-SS-3 Information Security Category
  • CFTC-SS-8 Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plan and Resources

ISO 27701:2019 · 2 controls

  • 6.14 Information security aspects of business continuity management
  • 6.14.1 Information security continuity

ISO/IEC 29100:2024 · 2 controls

  • 29100-6.10 Information security
  • ISO29100-5.10.10 Information Security

NIS2 Directive · 2 controls

  • Art.21.2.c Business continuity, backup management, disaster recovery and crisis management
  • Art.21.2.j Multi-factor or continuous authentication, secured communications and secured emergency communications
  • E8-BACKUP-ML1 Regular Backups (ML1)
  • A.7.6 A.7.6 Emergencies, unusual situations and disruptive events

APRA CPS 234 · 1 control

  • CPS234-P24 Information Security Response Plans
  • ASD37-35 Business continuity and disaster recovery plans (Very Good)
  • AEO-12 Crisis Management and Incident Recovery

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

CIS Controls v8 · 1 control

  • CIS-11.1 Establish and Maintain a Data Recovery Process

DORA · 1 control

IEC 62443 · 1 control

  • 62443-3-3-FR7-SR-7-1 Denial-of-Service Protection (FR7 Resource Availability)

MTCS (Singapore) · 1 control

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Organizational controls – ISO 27002:2022

You are reading one control. How much of ISO 27002:2022 have you already done?

ISO 27002:2022 5.29 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO 27002:2022 your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and 79 of 93 ISO 27002:2022 controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 180 were rejected on the NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 123 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.