NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 NIST-CSF-RC.RP-02: Recovery actions are selected, scoped, prioritized, and performed

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 33 controls across 20 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ISO 27001:2022 · 4 controls

5.24 Information security incident management planning and preparation
5.26 Response to information security incidents
5.29 Information security during disruption
5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 4 controls

NIST800-CP-10 CP-10 System Recovery and Reconstitution
NIST800-CP-2 CP-2 Contingency Plan
NIST800-CP-4 CP-4 Contingency Plan Testing
NIST800-IR-8 IR-8 Incident Response Plan

ISO 27002:2022 · 3 controls

5.24 Information security incident management planning and preparation
5.29 Information security during disruption
5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 2 controls

ASD37-35 Business continuity and disaster recovery plans (Very Good)
ASD37-36 System recovery capabilities (Very Good)

Australian Information Security Manual · 2 controls

ISM-1731 Separate system for remediation planning
ISM-1732 Coordinated remediation during a planned outage

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 2 controls

CCM-BCR-03 Business Continuity Strategy
CCM-BCR-09 Disaster Response Plan

ISO 22301:2019 · 2 controls

8.2.2 Business impact analysis
8.4.5 Recovery

SOC 2 · 2 controls

SOC2-A1.3 A1.3 Testing recovery plan procedures
SOC2-CC9.1 CC9.1 Mitigating risks of business disruption

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 1 control

SEC10-BP04 Develop and test security incident response playbooks

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

ASBv3-IR-5 Detection and analysis - prioritize incidents

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-BCM-02 Business impact analysis policies and instructions

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) · 1 control

CFTC-SS-9 Next Business Day Recovery Time Objective

CIS Controls v8 · 1 control

CIS-11.1 Establish and Maintain a Data Recovery Process

FedRAMP High · 1 control

CP-2 Contingency Plan

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.308(a)(7)(ii)(E) Applications and Data Criticality Analysis (Addressable)

NIS2 Directive · 1 control

Art.21.2.c Business continuity, backup management, disaster recovery and crisis management

NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 3 · 1 control

RC.RP-02 RC.RP-02 Recovery actions selected by plan criteria and adjusted to reassessed needs

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.308(a)(7)(ii)(E) Applications and Data Criticality Analysis (Addressable)

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

10.7.3 10.7.3 Respond promptly to critical security control failures

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 have you already done?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 NIST-CSF-RC.RP-02 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 73 of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27001:202268.9% covered · 33 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 567.9% covered · 34 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)67% covered · 35 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate63.2% covered · 39 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202258.5% covered · 44 gaps If you hold CIS Controls v853.8% covered · 49 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 174 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free